On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:57 PM, Peter Hall wrote:
>> From the discussions that I can recall, I thought it was to permit
> more complex type combinations, adding intersection types using "&".
> (which is why I like the change).
That was one meaning of "future-proof", yeah. Another was to avoid
over
>From the discussions that I can recall, I thought it was to permit
more complex type combinations, adding intersection types using "&".
(which is why I like the change).
Peter
On Feb 13, 2008 11:48 PM, Brendan Eich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Peter Hall wrote:
>
On Feb 13, 2008, at 3:46 PM, Peter Hall wrote:
>>- Union types are spelled (x|y|z) now, not (x,y,z).
>> Popularity contest, the pipe character won.
>>
>
> Didn't notice that change! (and I like it :))
Popularity, but deeper reasons include (a) more future-proof; (b)
precedent from othe
>- Union types are spelled (x|y|z) now, not (x,y,z).
> Popularity contest, the pipe character won.
>
Didn't notice that change! (and I like it :))
Peter
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es4-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> as i was saying before [ctrl + v, enter] turned into [ctrl + enter]
> (maybe ctrl+enter is a bad thunderbird shortcut?)
> ==
>
> my lecture notes are here:
> http://moock.org/lectures/newInECMAScript4
>
> they are nearly entirely based on the overview at:
> http://
as i was saying before [ctrl + v, enter] turned into [ctrl + enter]
(maybe ctrl+enter is a bad thunderbird shortcut?)
==
my lecture notes are here:
http://moock.org/lectures/newInECMAScript4
they are nearly entirely based on the overview at:
http://www.ecmascript.org/es4/spec/overview.pdf
a
greetings all,
i'm a long-time lurker, full time ActionScript developer.
i have an upcoming presentation at FITC in amsterdam (february) and
toronto (april) that covers the features in ecma4 that are new to
ActionScript (i.e., those not already in ActionScript 3.0).
my lecture notes are here:
_
