On Feb 20, 2008, at 6:10 PM, Mike Samuel wrote:
JSON ⊂ ADsafe ⊂ Cajita ⊂ Caja ⊂ ES3 ⊂ ES4
People who know Unicode are dangerous ;).
Yes, we need more of you ;-).
There's three problems according to my reading of http://
www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4627.txt but only the first is directly
At http://wiki.ecmascript.org/doku.php?id=ses:ses Doug Crockford
explains a rationale for a secure variant of EcmaScript, hereafter
ses. I am part of a team working on two such variants, Cajita and
Caja (Caja is mentioned on Crock's page. Cajita is a small ADsafe-like
subset of Caja). On the first
Resending after adding myself to es4-discuss.
On 20/02/2008, Mark Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[+es4-discuss]
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 4:59 PM, Mike Samuel wrote:
On 20/02/2008, Mark Miller wrote:
Since a language is commonly defined as the set of strings produced by a
particular
There's a lot of implicit context here, some of which may be new to
es4-discuss readers. Also, not everything here is bound to become an
Ecma standard, as noted in mail I sent earlier today (3.1 could be a
TR and should be in the view of some on the TC39 committee). Comments
inline below,
Hi Brendan, thanks for the long and thoughtful answer. I think we have
many points of agreement.
I'll be responding to your message point by point soon. Tonight I'll
just mention a few that jumped out at me.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Brendan Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now we could
