On 9/5/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Lars T Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/spec.html
> > >
> > > Bottom of the page.
> > >
> > > I found that it was convenient for pr
On 8/26/07, Lars T Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/spec.html
> >
> > Bottom of the page.
> >
> > I found that it was convenient for printing.
> >
> > Am I'm reading another out-of-date spec?
>
> Very.
On Sep 3, 2007, at 7:10 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
> On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
>
>> On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Back to "caller"...
>>> "caller" is on the prototype in Mozilla.
>
> Not lately:
>
> js> function f(){ return f.hasOwnProperty('caller')}
On Sep 3, 2007, at 3:00 AM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Back to "caller"...
>> "caller" is on the prototype in Mozilla.
Not lately:
js> function f(){ return f.hasOwnProperty('caller')}
js> f()
This is a SpiderMonkey REPL based on code going int
On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back to "caller"...
> "caller" is on the prototype in Mozilla. Not sure where it is in IE,
> prototype or instance.
>
> On the instance in WebKit.
>
> Absent in Opera.
Absent in ES3. Absent in ES4.
function f() {
// I wonder how my caller
On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The
> perfectly valid use case of trying to have a private constructor, will
> not, unfortunately be accommodated by ES4;
Now filed as bug 166 in the Trac.
--lars
___
Es4-discuss mailing list
Es4-d
> > On 26/08/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Missing:
> > > Function.prototype.caller
> On 8/25/07, liorean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should this property really be on the prototype?
On 26/08/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's useful for two cases:
> 1. D
On 8/26/07, Lars T Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/spec.html
> >
> > Bottom of the page.
> >
> > I found that it was convenient for printing.
> >
> > Am I'm reading another out-of-date spec?
>
> Very.
On 8/26/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://developer.mozilla.org/es4/spec/spec.html
>
> Bottom of the page.
>
> I found that it was convenient for printing.
>
> Am I'm reading another out-of-date spec?
Very. This is the baseline spec, derived from the ActionScript 3
spec, somew
On 8/25/07, liorean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 26/08/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Missing:
> > Function.prototype.caller
>
> Should this property really be on the prototype?
It's useful for two cases:
1. Debugging
2. enforcing an entry point to a constructor.
The second u
On 26/08/07, Garrett Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Missing:
> Function.prototype.caller
Should this property really be on the prototype? Even placing it on
the Function instances alone seems a bad idea to me, since the value
is per call and not per function object. But placing it on the
Funct
PDF Spec:
Pages 163 - 168
Methods are not alphebetized. Many methods missing.
Page 163:
Missing:
Object.prototype.superclass ?
Missing:
Function.prototype.caller
Function.prototype.name ?
Duplicate:
Function.prototype
Missing:
Array extras
Array
12 matches
Mail list logo