-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Resig
Sent: 15. november 2007 02:27
Generic functions are used like this:
generic function a(b);
generic function a(b:int){}
generic function a(b:string){}
Yes.
Generics offer a point
It's a spec issue. --lars
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Yuh-Ruey Chen
Sent: 15. november 2007 01:53
To: Lars T Hansen
Cc: es4-discuss
Subject: Re: generic function with structural types questions
By fixed, do you mean an RI
-Original Message-
From: P T Withington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
P T Withington
Sent: 15. november 2007 14:02
To: Lars Hansen
Cc: John Resig; es4-discuss
Subject: Re: Understanding Generic Functions
On 2007-11-15, at 02:52 EST, Lars Hansen wrote:
[...]
Thanks. A bit more formal than was expecting, but I think it contains
what I'm looking for.
Peter
On Nov 14, 2007 3:36 PM, Brendan Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:40 AM, Peter Hall wrote:
After searching through the wiki and ecmascript.org site, I still
can't see any
Various interested parties favored something like the json2.js API
already, and I think everyone will rally round it and beat on it, to make
sure it has the right usability and knobs. I'm hopeful.
+1 from me. One request: When a filter function is provided to JSON.parse, I
would like the
On Nov 15, 2007, at 9:17 AM, Kris Zyp wrote:
+1 from me. One request: When a filter function is provided to
JSON.parse, I would like the filter to be called with |this|
defined to be the root object that is being created by the parsed
JSON text. Having a reference to the created root
On Nov 14, 2007, at 5:34 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
On Nov 14, 2007, at 2:03 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
Conversions: In addition, any value in the language converts to a
member of AnyBoolean, but the conversions specified are all to the
more specific boolean type, so perhaps it should be
On Nov 14, 2007, at 11:56 PM, Brendan Eich wrote:
Modula 3 had branding for making nominal types from structural
types, but going the other way, unbranding a nominal type to get
a structural type, has no precedent I know of,
Shaver pointed to generic metaprogramming using C++ templates,
On 2007-11-14, at 19:22 EST, Graydon Hoare wrote:
(As far as I can tell -- not being a dylan hacker -- dylan doesn't
even
go as far as having a global sentinel type like nil)
The Dylan equivalent of a nullable type is a union of your type with a
singleton that acts as the sentinel. Most
On 14/11/2007, Maciej Stachowiak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Section III.
Syntax: The new non-contextual keywords, and the resulting need to
specify dialect out of band, are a problem. I'll have more to say
about compatibility under separate cover.
The model with version and e4x arguments in
10 matches
Mail list logo
