On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
I believe let function is broken in the RI (it has been in the
past).
I encouraged Michael to file a trac ticket, and he did:
http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/337
Anyone else who finds an RI bug and can't see a report of it in the
Also see http://bugs.ecmascript.org/ticket/158. --lars
On Dec 14, 2007 7:42 PM, Brendan Eich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 13, 2007, at 11:42 PM, Lars T Hansen wrote:
I believe let function is broken in the RI (it has been in the past).
I encouraged Michael to file a trac ticket, and
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:50 PM, P T Withington wrote:
On 2007-09-23, at 14:14 EDT, Brendan Eich wrote:
The reason for the original prototype-owned constructor was to afford
a back-pointer from prototype to constructor function without
imposing a per-instance property (which could be optimized
