Brendan Eich wrote:
> There's no point in Visible if the property could be deleted
> altogether. What would be the difference?
Oops! Sorry! Lacking low-level insight I didn't think of that.
So my idea has no bearing at all on the inherent problems, much
less solved them. Too bad.
> That's not
Ingvar von Schoultz wrote:
> Some people yearn hotly for __proto__, preferrably writable if
> at all possible, while others point to problems with security
> and software privacy.
>
> I get the impression that this could be solved by adding a fourth
> flag among the property flags Enumerable, Writ
ss@mozilla.org
Subject: A read/write __proto__ that can vanish
Some people yearn hotly for __proto__, preferrably writable if
at all possible, while others point to problems with security
and software privacy.
I get the impression that this could be solved by adding a fourth
flag among the prope
On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Ingvar von Schoultz wrote:
> Some people yearn hotly for __proto__, preferrably writable if
> at all possible, while others point to problems with security
> and software privacy.
I wrote recently that __proto__ should be viewed as call/cc without
macros for common
Some people yearn hotly for __proto__, preferrably writable if
at all possible, while others point to problems with security
and software privacy.
I get the impression that this could be solved by adding a fourth
flag among the property flags Enumerable, Writable and Flexible.
There might be a fla