On Feb 19, 2008 10:21 AM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 19/02/2008, Garrett Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
(o.f)(); // =o
This should be window.
No it shouldn't. The grouping syntax specifically doesn't call
GetValue
On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically the idea was along the lines of investigating the effects of
removing GetValue usage from those productions whose semantics just
pass values through (such as all the shortcut evaluation operators,
parenthesised
On Feb 18, 2008 1:17 PM, liorean [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Basically the idea was along the lines of investigating the effects of
removing GetValue usage from those productions whose semantics just
pass values through (such as all the shortcut evaluation operators,
parenthesised
The correct interpretation is that a triple quoted string starts with
three quotes of the same kind and ends when the same three quotes are
seen in sequence provided that the character following the three is
not that same quote character.
(Whether you want to call that greedy or not depends on
There's a note on the triple-quoted string literals proposal*:
we decided that triple-quoted strings would be greedy when looking
for the closing triple-quotes.
Wouldn't this mean, in practice, that it is only possible to have two
triple-quoted string literals per source file (one with and
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of liorean
Sent: 18. februar 2008 11:53
To: es4-discuss@mozilla.org
Subject: Re: Greedy triple-quoted string literals
On 18/02/2008, Lars T Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The correct interpretation
On 18/02/2008, Lars T Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been pretty quiet around here since we debated tail calls...
I never finished my part of that discussion... I have a long message
half-written on it since how long? Three months ago? I never quite
finished my line of thought though.
