Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Hi, Related to ESME-47, I had a look at the current codebase, and many source files include Copyright 2008-2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC In their license header. According to http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#header-existingcopyright, such copyright notices should go away for

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread Richard Hirsch
Look at David's comment on the Jira Item: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-47?focusedCommentId=12729407page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#action_12729407 D. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi,

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread Richard Hirsch
OK. Sounds like a plan. Let's wait and see how David responds. D. On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote: Look at David's comment on the Jira Item:

Re: Issues currently assigned to release 1.0 that I would like to change

2010-01-08 Thread Vassil Dichev
Sorry for late reply. Ethan- great work collecting these. This is what I know: * 53 is almost complete- we miss viewing all pools I can read/write (not only administer) and deleting a whole pool. These are fairly trivial. * 119-122 shouldn't be easy by just including the lift:msgs element and

Container-based authentication

2010-01-08 Thread Richard Hirsch
Been thinking a lot about container based authentication - primarily, because of my interest in the CAS integration which is necessary for an OFBiz integration (search for OFBizCasAuthenticationHandler.java class for details) Here a few thoughts. in J2EE, the way to get the user is via the

Re: Tests for Original API

2010-01-08 Thread Ethan Jewett
Yay! Excellent! On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:58 AM, Richard Hirsch hirsch.d...@gmail.com wrote: I've created a new Jira item (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ESME-153) for testing the old API. I've also committed an initial set of tests. As we move towards our first release, we have to make

Re: Container-based authentication

2010-01-08 Thread Daniel Koller
...only a short remark: that would also ease the task to enable Win NT authentication. (because NT auth is then just a matter of container configuration). AFAIK there recipes already how to make it work on Tomcat. However we should look what this means for the task of role management. Kind

Re: Container-based authentication

2010-01-08 Thread Richard Hirsch
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Daniel Koller dakol...@googlemail.com wrote: ...only a short remark: that would also ease the task to enable Win NT authentication. (because NT auth is then just a matter of container configuration). AFAIK there recipes already how to make it work on Tomcat.

Re: Issues currently assigned to release 1.0 that I would like to change

2010-01-08 Thread Ethan Jewett
Yup, I just didn't list all the items, including ESME-111, that I had no problem with. I only listed the ones I wanted to take out of release 1.0 in some way. And yes, I did see David's tweet on Oauth. Good news. The likelihood of my starting to write that functionality is looking more and more

Re: Tests for Original API

2010-01-08 Thread Richard Hirsch
My idea is that through testing the old API, I will expose bugs that may be present at a deeper level (thus, having an impact on various APIs and the UI). If I can expose old API bugs that are restricted to this API, this is an unintended - but welcome - side effect. The one change I made to the

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread David Pollak
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Bertrand Delacretaz bdelacre...@apache.org wrote: Hi, Related to ESME-47, I had a look at the current codebase, and many source files include Copyright 2008-2009 WorldWide Conferencing, LLC In their license header. According to

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache 2.0 license, the license I granted in the code that I've contributed to the ESME project, states in section 4.3: You must retain, in the Source form of any Derivative Works that You distribute, all

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread David Pollak
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Gianugo Rabellino g.rabell...@sourcesense.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache 2.0 license, the license I granted in the code that I've contributed to the ESME project, states in section

Re: Can we remove Copyright WorldWide Conferencing , LLC in source files?

2010-01-08 Thread Gianugo Rabellino
On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 9:00 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Gianugo Rabellino g.rabell...@sourcesense.com wrote: On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 7:22 PM, David Pollak feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com wrote: The Apache 2.0 license, the license I