>
> I’m not sure how the former would help you, since you’re still constrained
> by the wire delays of the large data block.
>
>
I could, in the slower thread, upload the SDO in smaller parts (e.g. 64
bytes each) and use linear addressing for that.
>
> And the second just sounds like “I want non
[mailto:jeroen.vandenkey...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2013 22:14
To: Gavin Lambert
Cc: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: Re: [etherlab-dev] Large PDOs
Gavin,
Thanks for your reply. Currently this slave does not support SDOs since it
is a 'resource constrained' FPGA ba
;
>
>
> *From:* etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org [mailto:
> etherlab-dev-boun...@etherlab.org] *On Behalf Of *Jeroen Van den Keybus
> *Sent:* Wednesday, 11 December 2013 11:02
> *To:* etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
> *Subject:* [etherlab-dev] Large PDOs
>
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
&
.org] On Behalf Of Jeroen Van den
Keybus
Sent: Wednesday, 11 December 2013 11:02
To: etherlab-dev@etherlab.org
Subject: [etherlab-dev] Large PDOs
Hi,
I want to use a single, quite large (1,024 byte) PDO.
Does anyone know how to specify such a large PDO in the XML description file
/ SII
Hi,
I want to use a single, quite large (1,024 byte) PDO.
Does anyone know how to specify such a large PDO in the XML description
file / SII EEPROM content ? It seems that only base types are allowed as
DataType in a PDO entry (basically any common data type up to 64 bits).
Even if using 64-bit
