SOT office is suppossed to be better than Open Office and Star Office.
http://www.sot.com/en/linux/soto/advantages.shtml
Does anyone else used these products?
Ben
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm talking to a guy about a new workstation running Redhat. It might have a
striped, mirrored set of drives totaling 320 gigs for capacity and throughput. He
does some heavy arithmatic and uses most of this to hold temporary files that could
be 5 - 10 gigs in size. The computer he has
Title: RE: [EUG-LUG:2560] BIG FILES
Bob,
I believe that large file support was added in the 2.4 kernel. Not sure what apps will work with 2 Gb files, but I could copy one from my HP-UX box and try it. Let me know if you want me to try.
Garl
-Original Message-
From: Bob Crandell
Have you guys read the letter at www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25157.html ???
I am blown away at the knowledge and savvy of this Peruvian Congressman. Maybe
somebody will pop my bubble, but he is single-handedly tearing apart every argument
that MS has for proprietary software over free
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 05:16:55PM -0700, Tim Howe wrote:
Have you guys read the letter at www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25157.html
Thanks for the link. I hadn't seen that. Even if it wasn't from
a Peruvian Congressman (the person obviously has spent some time with
free software, and given
I haven't seen any response so far, and my answer doesn't exactly
address the central questions (auto-upgrade/pay-system/or free)
But if you like more control over what will happen on your
machine a manual upgrade is described in:
http://www.mandrakesecure.net
Then click a patch: (it
I know somebody who had that problem. What you need to
do is download and compile the 'enterprise' kernel and
your problems shalt be solved (after I finish your box
first).
Mr O
--- Grigsby, Garl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bob,
I believe that large file support was added in
the 2.4
