Re: [eug-lug]A WinXP patch

2003-07-21 Thread dsoper
On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:20:11PM -0700, jamie wrote: Hello,This is a WinXP patch I hope you would enjoy it. DANGER WILL ROBINSON!!! DANGER!!! I have it from reliable authorities that it will reformat your hard drive and install the latest version of Slackware. Cheers, Dennis --

Re: [eug-lug]Cloning a web site

2003-07-21 Thread Ken Barber
Cory, Ben, Garl -- Thanks for your help. The problem wasn't so much with me not knowing how to use wget as it was with the fact that the to-be-cloned site was hosted on AOL: The index page was so full of javascript garbage that wget couldn't parse anything, so it just downloaded the index

Re: [eug-lug]A WinXP patch

2003-07-21 Thread Mr O
And that dangerous? That's a blessing in disguise. Though speaking of new patches, let it be known that RedHat has released their next beta. --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, Jul 20, 2003 at 06:20:11PM -0700, jamie wrote: Hello,This is a WinXP patch I hope you would enjoy it.

Re: [eug-lug]A WinXP patch

2003-07-21 Thread Larry Price
OK, no more mr. NiceBot Jamie is not to blame, here are the relevant headers. From: jamie [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sun Jul 20, 2003 6:20:11 PM US/Pacific To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [eug-lug]A WinXP patch Reply-To: The Eugene Unix and GNU/Linux User Group's mail list [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[eug-lug]Re: [lug] Spam Filtering With Remote Access

2003-07-21 Thread John Sechrest
that is a very interesting idea. Our problem is that our mail front ends and our mail backends are distributed across many machines. And that we have sendmail at the core. So we have some fundamental design questions to look at. Cooper Stevenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: % On Fri,

[eug-lug]soapbox: restrict processes from tampering with files (anda few other projects)

2003-07-21 Thread Ben Barrett
http://dag.wieers.com/home-made/soapbox/ Goal: It was written to sandbox my RPM build system to prevent pollution of my clean build environments by untrusted Makefiles. Intelligent people would wonder why building package as a user isn't sufficient. The rest of the dag site is pretty neat too!

[eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Crandell
Hi, The computer they are complaining about [216.239.175.40] is not running sendmail or qmail, yet spamers are using it somehow. Please tell me there is enough information here to determine that they are spoofing. This computer is not supposed to be handling email at all. I'm trying to help

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Roger
Hi, What does it run? If it's a web server, does someone have a script to send email without the TO defined in the script? Roger Around Mon,Jul 21 2003, at 11:10, Bob Crandell, wrote: Hi, The computer they are complaining about [216.239.175.40] is not running sendmail or qmail, yet spamers

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Miller
Bob Crandell wrote: The computer they are complaining about [216.239.175.40] is not running sendmail or qmail, yet spamers are using it somehow. Please tell me there is enough information here to determine that they are spoofing. This computer is not supposed to be handling email at all.

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Cory Petkovsek
On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:10:50PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, The computer they are complaining about [216.239.175.40] is not running sendmail or qmail, yet spamers are using it somehow. Please tell me there is enough information here to determine that they are spoofing. This computer

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Crandell
It's running DansGuardian as a frontend to Squid. The OS is Slackware 8.1 (I think) That's all it does. Roger ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: Hi, What does it run? If it's a web server, does someone have a script to send email without the TO defined in the script? Roger Around Mon,Jul 21 2003, at

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Crandell
Ok, Ben and Cory, first one to respond gets a paycheck. Cory Petkovsek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Mon, Jul 21, 2003 at 11:10:50PM +, Bob Crandell wrote: Hi, The computer they are complaining about [216.239.175.40] is not running sendmail or qmail, yet spamers are using it somehow.

[eug-lug]sensors

2003-07-21 Thread Timothy Bolz
Has anyone gotten the temp senors for the cpu working. From what I've been reading you need the ic2 support, ic2 bit banging, ic2 devices, and ic2 proc modules installed. I have them installed and run the lmsensor package. I'm not sure if you install the modules if you have to compile the

[eug-lug]Dropline

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Crandell
Hi, Has anyone taken a look at http://freshmeat.net/releases/128424/? About: Dropline GNOME is a version of the GNOME Desktop that has been tweaked for Slackware Linux systems. It is available in Slackware's standard .tgz package format, in addition to the usual source code. The current release

Re: [eug-lug]Spoofing?

2003-07-21 Thread Ben Barrett
If you're fairly certain about your box (and it is possible that it is relaying mail on some odd port or even generating mail to send out, via some worm or other nasty), then I'd say to remember that the IP address is easily claimed on any machine anywhere... maybe close to the next hop, in

Re: [eug-lug]sensors

2003-07-21 Thread Bob Miller
Timothy Bolz wrote: Has anyone gotten the temp senors for the cpu working. From what I've been reading you need the ic2 support, ic2 bit banging, ic2 devices, and ic2 proc modules installed. I have them installed and run the lmsensor package. I'm not sure if you install the modules if you