Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-23 Thread Bob Miller
Hal Pomeranz wrote: I'm in the market for a graphics card (PCI Express) for running a fairly generic Linux (Ubuntu 7.10) desktop. I'm not planning on gaming or other rendering-intensive tasks-- just normal desktop use, some streaming video, etc. At a minimum, it needs to drive a 24

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-23 Thread Ben Barrett
Bob, is your 24 monitor 4:3 or 16:10 aspect ratio? Looks like only the very last display resolution you quoted was wide-screen. I use a pair of measly 20ers but 1680x1050 is their widescreen hardware res. One is actually upright, 1050x1680, and displays long documents nicely. ~ben On Sat, Feb

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-23 Thread Hal Pomeranz
What about 1680x1050 is low-end?? Well, the Intel 965 chipset in my Thinkpad can drive the monitor at 1680x1050 and higher, so I assumed that this was old hat for PCIe cards. I'm guessing that you're specifying that you don't need to run 3D games? (ie, that 2D will suffice) or is that 2D

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Mr O
24 has a native resolution of 1920x1200. 20 and 22 are 1680x1050. Pretty much any *new* ATI or Nvidi card will do the trick however my 24 forced me into an upgrade because I do in fact play a few games and trying to play at native resolution brought my existing card to its digital knees. That be

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Hal Pomeranz
24 has a native resolution of 1920x1200. 20 and 22 are 1680x1050. Yeah, but I'm an old fart and 1920x1200 is too tiny for my weakening eyes... :-) --Hal ___ EUGLUG mailing list euglug@euglug.org http://www.euglug.org/mailman/listinfo/euglug

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Allen Brown
You can all jump on me for this but, as far as I can tell there are *no* Linux-friendly graphics companies today. None release their API. Instead they provide a binary driver. That's not in the spirit of things. -- Allen Brown http://brown.armoredpenguin.com/~abrown I'm in the market for a

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Gabriel Merritt
Hal, I'm not sure what low end means for you, but I've been running Nvidia cards for about three years now and have had high compatibility with Linux. Nvidia actually provides a proprietary driver (for free) that you can download, build and install as a module. If you aren't going for the 3D

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Mr O
Gabe, what motherboard do you have? I run an 8800GT flawlessly. What distro? If you're using Ubuntu I'd recommend Envy to install the Nvidia driver. I've never had an issue on Slackware, Gentoo, or Arch (my current desktop distro) running any decent cards. That be all, Mr O. --- Gabriel Merritt

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Bill Barry
Both Nvidia and ATI release binary drivers and the NVIDIA drivers seem to be released faster with better quality. But recently ATI/AMD promised open source drivers http://enterpriselinuxlog.blogs.techtarget.com/2007/05/09/amd-will-deliver-open-graphics-drivers/ so that might become a better

Re: [Eug-lug] good (low-end) graphics card?

2008-02-22 Thread Ben Barrett
What about 1680x1050 is low-end?? I'm guessing that you're specifying that you don't need to run 3D games? (ie, that 2D will suffice) or is that 2D minimum avoidable? Yeah, AFAICT any basic intel/ati/nvideo card (or clone) should suffice, just check specs on desired resolution :) If you want 3D,