[ED] R: Tournament Partnership with Game Advisors

For me open discussion can continue ... P Inviato da smartphone Samsung Galaxy. Messaggio originale Da: "Patrick van der Valk (BULA)" Data: 21/02/18 16:09 (GMT+01:00) A: Liam Kelly Cc:

[ED] Game Advisors go home (and other insights)

Can you agree, that in a game of Ultimate, MAKING A CALL, and RESOLVING A CALL, each have unique meaning and implications? Try this: Imagine a new type of "Game Police", who's role is to MAKE CALLS, but who requires the decision-making (resolving) to be made by the players. What would it look

Re: [ED] Tournament Partnership with Game Advisors

Hi Liam, To reply to your question, the fact that you are member of the Game Advisor Committee of the WFDF, and a WFDF advisor, is the more relevant for me. You, and the WFDF have the right to publish on the Eurodisc mailing-list, or on the Ultimate Players in Europe FB page, like everybody, so

Re: [ED] Tournament Partnership with Game Advisors

Hi Patrick and all, About the only point on which we disagree, ;-). You are right, advisors don't remove all the responsibility of the players like it is the case with referees (or almost all, because even in professional sports, players keep some responsibilities). USAU observers remove more

Re: [ED] Game Advisors go home (and other insights)

Yes, it is important to know the rules well, and that is why there is a good tool for that after reading the rules..., it is the WFDF rules accrediation system. I also find it shocking that some players at the highest level do not know the rules well enough, but I find it more shocking that some