Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-11 Thread JHByrne
In a message dated 10/10/2002 2:35:29 PM Alaskan Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: If there happen to be any Dyson shells in the process of being built, they might be noticed by the FAME or Kepler missions (they would tend to appear to be long period variable stars). Robert It seems to

Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-10 Thread Bruce Moomaw
- Original Message - From: James McEnanly [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 2:39 PM Subject: Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest] Why not look for stars that are pertrubed by an unseen body, looking for 'gravity's silhouette',

Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-10 Thread LARRY KLAES
There is a recent paper which indicates that many of the transits detected by OGLE (Optical Gravitational Lensing Experiment) may only be small stars instead of exoplanets. Here is the URL to that paper: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0207192 I learned about the above paper at this great

RE: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-10 Thread John Sheff
We already are. It is a common technique for detecting 'astrometric' and 'spectroscopic' binaries and multiple star systems. The trick is to distinguish an artificial unseen body from the numerous examples of natural ones. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-10 Thread LARRY KLAES
Oh yes, and for those who would like more information on Dyson Spheres, Ringworlds, and the like: http://www.aleph.se/Trans/Tech/Megascale/index.html http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/MatrioshkaBrains/index.html Larry- Original Message - From: Robert J. Bradbury Sent: Thursday,

Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-09 Thread Robert J. Bradbury
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, Gary McMurtry wrote: In the collection is an article by Ian Crawford entitled Where Are They?, subtitled Maybe we are alone in the galaxy after all. I found this article thought provoking to say the least. Crawford uses the SETI results to date to suggest that we

Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-09 Thread JHByrne
In a message dated 10/9/2002 4:54:50 AM Alaskan Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: My objections weren't as much to Crawford's ideas as they were to the Andrew LePage sidebar. The problem in general however still remains -- the significant majority of current "SETI" searches are directed

Re: Life and SETI [was RE: Survival of the Flattest]

2002-10-09 Thread Robert J. Bradbury
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED], responding to my comments, wrote: He suggests that we can't find suns transmitting signals, because those suns are already cloaked, and pumping energy into vast 'ringworlds'. Actually, more like sphere-worlds but that is a technical detail. I'd have