On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Thomas Green wrote:
> Yeesh! and I thought I was a pessimist :-)
>
> As far as can NASA do anything useful for $1B and innovate? Get a grip!!
> NEAR: total mission cost of $200m
> Pathfinder: total mission cost of $260m
>
> Is this unreasonable costs? Inefficient? S
Title: RE: 'NASA Sets its Sights on Nuclear Rocket to Mars"
Yeesh! and I thought I was a pessimist :-)
As far as can NASA do anything useful for $1B and innovate? Get a grip!!
NEAR: total mission cost of $200m
Pathfinder: total mission cost of $260m
Is this unreason
Greetings,
My only fear is that the technology will work (and work quite well) only
to be killed of in the great management fiasco called NASA. I know they
mean well, but you cannot innovate when you need to show progress
reports every week.
Joe L.
On Fri, 2003-01-17 at 10:45, Robert J. Brad
On Fri, 17 Jan 2003, Bruce Moomaw wrote:
> Starting this program at this particular time strikes me as absolutely
> harebrained; but then this administration seems to specialize in the
> harebrained, particularly in recent months.
You will get no argument from me with respect to our harebrained
