On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we going to have this thing radio controlled or a cable/wire attached to
it?
From the CalTech glaciology website...
For electromagnetic waves with frequencies from 5 to 300 MHz the loss of
energy by absorption in ice is sufficiently small
ent of ice movement.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday 28
October 2002 05:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Radio control v. Wire...
and 1 part or 2?
Are we going to have this thing radio controlled or a
cable/wire attached to
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Reeve, Jack W. wrote:
A few miles of light-transmitting fiber spooled out behind the cryobot
shouldn't weigh any more than the proposed transmission pucks. Also, if a
metallic filament were adjacent the optical line(s), it could be
periodically heated to reposition and
control v. Wire... and 1 part or 2?
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002, Reeve, Jack W. wrote:
A few miles of light-transmitting fiber spooled out behind the cryobot
shouldn't weigh any more than the proposed transmission pucks. Also, if
a
metallic filament were adjacent the optical line(s), it could
, thereby allowing the tether to
be spooled out from the surface, freeing the probe of this burden.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Robert J. Bradbury [mailto:bradbury;aeiveos.com]
Sent: Monday 28 October 2002 13:49
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Radio control v. Wire... and 1 part
the line plays out through a hole at
end/center.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Joe Latrell [mailto:joe_latrell;beyond-earth.com]
Sent: Monday 28 October 2002 15:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Radio control v. Wire... and 1 part or 2?
How big is this thing supposed to be? Depending