[EuroPython] Talks, acceptance and fish

2005-03-02 Thread Heimo Laukkanen
Chris Withers said... Indeed, but there is already a refereed track, or am I mistaken? .. More work, less dynamism... sounds like programming in Java .. I actually thought the Zope track last year was pretty good... Everything does not need to be dynamic and ad hoc... I agree that zope track was ok

Re: [EuroPython] Scheduling call for papers and acceptance of talks

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Withers
Paul Everitt wrote: During the Plone Con in Vienna, I noticed lots of people sitting outside. I asked a few what were the reasons. The main one was, they liked to socialize. :^) However, some folks also seemed disappointed with the quality of some presentations. That IS a shame :-S I'm intere

Re: [EuroPython] Scheduling call for papers and acceptance of talks

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Withers
Paul Everitt wrote: Again, should we try to improve the quality? If there isn't a strong opinion that this needs attention, Heimo and I will drop it. If it is worth looking into, though, how can we achieve it? It won't help getting reading for this year, but how about some kind of rating syst