On torsdag 09 juni 2005 21:01, Ken Rimey wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to suggest maybe scheduling Jukka Laurila's talk
> about "Python on the Phone" a bit earlier in the conference.
> My own talk on experience with Python for Series 60 would
> more naturally follow his, although this is not essential.
Hi,
I'd like to suggest maybe scheduling Jukka Laurila's talk
about "Python on the Phone" a bit earlier in the conference.
My own talk on experience with Python for Series 60 would
more naturally follow his, although this is not essential.
Ken Rimey
__
On Thu, 2005-06-09 at 14:56, Magnus Lycka wrote:
> > I have made a first draft schedule at:
> > http://www.strakt.com/~jacob/europython/schedule.html
>
> Thanks Jacob, the conference suddenly seems more "real"
> when you see it like this. :) I hope to see a set schedule
> soon at the web site.
>
> I have made a first draft schedule at:
> http://www.strakt.com/~jacob/europython/schedule.html
Thanks Jacob, the conference suddenly seems more "real"
when you see it like this. :) I hope to see a set schedule
soon at the web site.
Bea and Harald: Johan Andersson's talk "Tests for team
motivat
Dear Jacob,
thank you for proclaiming that schedule! Within the tutorials track, we have the following talk schedule agreement:
1) we will start with an "KickStart Workshop / Seminar". This will be
together with Social Skills; there will be a very empowering seminar on
persuading people and se
torsdag 09 juni 2005 08.50 skrev Harald Armin Massa:
> Dear Jacob,
>
> thank you for proclaiming that schedule! Within the tutorials track, we
> have the following talk schedule agreement:
>
> 1) we will start with an "KickStart Workshop / Seminar". This will be
> together with Social Skills; there
There is a scheduling meeting on Thursday 9 June at 17.30 CEST. As usual we
are on the Freenode IRC channel.
I have made a first draft schedule at:
http://www.strakt.com/~jacob/europython/schedule.html
The purpose of this schedule is to allocate time between the different tracks
and to allocate
Paul Everitt wrote:
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Heimo Laukkanen wrote:
Talk acceptance:
- require the actual presentation to be submitted ( we've been very
flexible with this previously )
Why is this a requirement?
During the Plone Con in Vienna, I noticed lots of people
Paul Everitt wrote:
During the Plone Con in Vienna, I noticed lots of people sitting
outside. I asked a few what were the reasons. The main one was, they
liked to socialize. :^) However, some folks also seemed disappointed
with the quality of some presentations.
That IS a shame :-S
I'm intere
Paul Everitt wrote:
Again, should we try to improve the quality? If there isn't a strong
opinion that this needs attention, Heimo and I will drop it. If it is
worth looking into, though, how can we achieve it?
It won't help getting reading for this year, but how about some kind of
rating syst
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:31:39AM +, Paul Everitt wrote:
> liked to socialize. :^) However, some folks also seemed disappointed
> with the quality of some presentations.
>
> ask people to prepare in advance. Benefits: people don't throw
> something together at the last minute, we attract
I totally agree with you, that presentation material is overrated and
should be subservient to the presenter. And yes, this fact is mostly
missed by terrified speakers that recite their bulleted lists to the
audience. :^)
Still, we need *some* kind of metric on which to base talk selection.
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
Heimo Laukkanen wrote:
Talk acceptance:
- require the actual presentation to be submitted ( we've been very
flexible with this previously )
Why is this a requirement?
During the Plone Con in Vienna, I noticed lots of people sitting
outside. I
Let me second Chris,
> > This is just to make sure that people don't feel too comfortable on
> > what they already know and try to scrap up the presentations an hour
> > before the presentation.
>
> This doesn't feel too valid to me. I didn't experience this with any of
> the presentations
Heimo Laukkanen wrote:
Talk acceptance:
- require the actual presentation to be submitted ( we've been very
flexible with this previously )
Why is this a requirement?
> This is just to make sure that people don't feel too comfortable on
> what they already know and try to scrap up the present
Hi ya all,
I just had a talk with Paul Everitt about the call for papers and making
sure that the quality of the presentations will be high. We would like to
do following on the Zope-track and ask comments/thoughts from others.
Marketing:
- start spreading the word about dates as soon as pos
16 matches
Mail list logo
