Re: [EuroPython] Scheduling call for papers and acceptance of talks

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Everitt
On Feb 24, 2005, at 9:53 AM, Chris Withers wrote: Heimo Laukkanen wrote: Talk acceptance: - require the actual presentation to be submitted ( we've been very flexible with this previously ) Why is this a requirement? During the Plone Con in Vienna, I noticed lots of people sitting outside. I

Re: [EuroPython] Scheduling call for papers and acceptance of talks

2005-02-27 Thread Paul Everitt
I totally agree with you, that presentation material is overrated and should be subservient to the presenter. And yes, this fact is mostly missed by terrified speakers that recite their bulleted lists to the audience. :^) Still, we need *some* kind of metric on which to base talk selection.

Re: [EuroPython] Scheduling call for papers and acceptance of talks

2005-02-27 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 11:31:39AM +, Paul Everitt wrote: > liked to socialize. :^) However, some folks also seemed disappointed > with the quality of some presentations. > > ask people to prepare in advance. Benefits: people don't throw > something together at the last minute, we attract