On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:04:48PM +0200, Paul Boddie wrote:
I think that we've been very Web 1.0 for EuroPython 2008, but that's not
always a bad thing. On the subject of less-than-fancy solutions, I realised
that my nasty timetable program didn't convert from EEST to UTC correctly
(being
Hello Europython Speakers. All of you are receiving this mail
because we have no record of you registering for Europython. I
realise that some of you have been waiting to find out if your
travel stipend has been approved, and one of you has been waiting
for the invitation letter necessary for
We should change the page to say 100 for speakers even late, correct?
Thanks very much,
Laura
--- Forwarded Message
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Mon Jun 16 16:50:23 2008
From: Peter Bulychev [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Nag Nag Nag
2008/6/16 Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We should change the page to say 100 for speakers even late, correct?
The registration system page and form is correct: it is the wiki which
is wrong, which is the problem I was warning against a few weeks ago:
having the same information in two
In a message of Mon, 16 Jun 2008 16:09:49 BST, John Pinner writes:
2008/6/16 Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We should change the page to say 100 for speakers even late, correct?
The registration system page and form is correct: it is the wiki which
is wrong, which is the problem I was
Laura Creighton:
I think I paid for Jacob at the regular conference rates, so perhaps
he is not showing up as a speaker? Perhaps we have some people who
registered as speakers despite not having any talks? I haven't
checked this -- has anybody?
The current idea is to indicate speakers on
Hi,
2008/6/16 Laura Creighton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think I paid for Jacob at the regular conference rates, so perhaps
he is not showing up as a speaker?
The Talks system marks him as a speaker, so yes he is a speaker. And
you paid for him at speaker rate, so that's OK.
Perhaps we have some
