Yes, at 44k the OEM tires were definitely due for a replacement.
The PLUS version of the Ecopia are supposed to last a lot longer than
the OEM (non-plus) versions. [The rubber is harder or somethingthe
cost was very close to the same, so I went with the plus versions...]
Only time/miles
I got barely 20k off Ecopia. In fairness, I rotated a little late, and figured
a brand-new car shouldn’t need an alignment. Still…
Michelin Energia fared a little better.
Sincerely,
Bob Bath
Note: any misspellings of the contents of this message are due to 56 y.o.
vision, hyperactive spell
I replaced the stock Ecopia's (non-plus from Nissan) at 44k miles on my
Leaf with Bridgestone Ecopia EP 422 PLUS (which are supposed to have a
longer life) but so far I've only put another 8K on the tires, so I
can't say if they are any better than the stock ones...
Jay
On 9/20/21 7:39 PM,
Michelin A/S vs Ecopia or is there a better option? Lawrence Rhodes
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO:
