Re: [EVDL] Tesla now using cameras only

[EVDL Administrator via EV]

On 28 May 2021 at 21:08, Mark Hanson via EV wrote:

> All manufacturing companies are constantly reducing costs, maximizing profits.

Right.  And when those cost reductions make the product less safe, the long 
term cost can end up being much higher.  

And that's just the economic cost.  The human cost is another matter 
entirely.  It was cheaper for Ford to pay legal judgements for dead and 
burned Pinto passengers than to fix the car's gas tank design.  Anybody here 
want to argue that that was an ethical choice?

Not that I'm actually drawing an analogy between Tesla's possible hobbling 
of their autopilot and Ford's Pinto debacle yet.  Let's see what happens.

David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey

To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my 
offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 
 Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in 
 humanity. It eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals, and 
 lets us get straight to the business of hate, debauchery, 
 and self-annihilation.

   -- Johnny Hart
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = 

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

[EVDL] Tesla now using cameras only

[Mark Hanson via EV]

Hi folks
Eliminating Lidar and Radar on Tesla’s 3 and Y is a cost cutting measure.  All 
manufacturing companies are constantly reducing costs, maximizing profits.  
Best regards
Mark

Sent from my iPhone
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

[EVDL] Moped makes it 31 miles up mountain.

[Lawrence Rhodes via EV]

There is a  video of this model's former configuration...it stalled half way 
up. The improved model with lithium takes the trip with no problem. Probably 
the model to get for San Francisco hills.  Lawrence Rhodes

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sak5Sfqa0Og
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Re: [EVDL] tesla now using cameras only

[paul dove via EV]

 I wondered what caused that, startles me every time it does that because it 
brakes hard.

On Friday, May 28, 2021, 5:39:29 AM CDT, Mark Laity-Snyder via EV 
 wrote:  
 
 So how do you determine what has priority using both vision and radar? One of 
the problems Tesla has is phantom breaking.  If you use both,  You have a 
situation where one could be saying go and the other says break.  Obviously 
breaking has to override go to be safe.  But then the car can break when not 
needed and you get rear ended because the guy behind saw no reason for your 
breaking because there was none.  

Sent from my iPhone

> IMO, Musk is not smart enough to listen to his AP team.  (some of the best
> people in the world at this)  He's known for firing people who resist his
> ideas.
> 
> I use Tesla AP all the time, and often in heavy Bay Area traffic.  One of
> the cool tricks radar enabled is detecting a car in front of another car in
> front of you.  For instance, say a Honda Civic is in front, followed by a
> Ford Excursion.  The Honda slams on his brakes, but the Excursion guy is on
> his phone and doesn't see the Honda until it's too late.  My radar-equipped
> Tesla will slow down as soon as the Honda does, giving more time for cars
> to react behind me.  It's literally saved the day on more than one
> occasion.
> 
> Elon's theory is "People drive with vision only, they don't have Lidar or
> Radar".  That's bullshit.  Driver assistance systems have to be superhuman
> if we are going to let them have full authority.  It can't just be "as good
> as a human", it has to be 100 or even 1000 times better than a human, or it
> will never be allowed to assume full control.  Radar is cheap superhero
> capability.
> 
> I think what happened is the semiconductor shortage impacted Tesla's radar
> supply, so they found a work-around.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:16 AM EVDL Administrator via EV <
> ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sometimes I really wonder about Tesla.  With the less than stellar
>> reputation that autopilot already has, it seems odd that they would
>> actually
>> delete some of the system's "eyes."  For the sake of EVs in general, I
>> sure
>> hope they know what they're doing.
>> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
>> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>  Never been to Cleveland when the sun was shining.
>>  Even when it shines, it looks like rain.
>>        -- Melanie Safka, "Between the Road Signs"
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> ___
>> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> <http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20210527/368fff14/attachment.html>
> 
> --
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> ___
> EV@lists.evdl.org
> For general EVDL support, see http://evdl.org/help/
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 
> 
> --
> 
> End of EV Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27
> ***

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
  
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.evdl.org/private.cgi/ev-evdl.org/attachments/20210528/220508d5/attachment.html>
___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Re: [EVDL] tesla now using cameras only

[Mark Grasser via EV]

I'm not sure how to read this. I think you mean brake, not break. LOL. Sorry
just really annoyed me this morning.
Mark

-Original Message-
From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Mark Laity-Snyder
via EV
Sent: Friday, May 28, 2021 5:39 AM
To: ev@lists.evdl.org
Cc: Mark Laity-Snyder
Subject: Re: [EVDL] tesla now using cameras only

So how do you determine what has priority using both vision and radar? One
of the problems Tesla has is phantom breaking.  If you use both,  You have a
situation where one could be saying go and the other says break.  Obviously
breaking has to override go to be safe.  But then the car can break when not
needed and you get rear ended because the guy behind saw no reason for your
breaking because there was none.  

Sent from my iPhone

> IMO, Musk is not smart enough to listen to his AP team.  (some of the best
> people in the world at this)   He's known for firing people who resist his
> ideas.
> 
> I use Tesla AP all the time, and often in heavy Bay Area traffic.  One of
> the cool tricks radar enabled is detecting a car in front of another car
in
> front of you.  For instance, say a Honda Civic is in front, followed by a
> Ford Excursion.  The Honda slams on his brakes, but the Excursion guy is
on
> his phone and doesn't see the Honda until it's too late.  My
radar-equipped
> Tesla will slow down as soon as the Honda does, giving more time for cars
> to react behind me.   It's literally saved the day on more than one
> occasion.
> 
> Elon's theory is "People drive with vision only, they don't have Lidar or
> Radar".  That's bullshit.  Driver assistance systems have to be superhuman
> if we are going to let them have full authority.  It can't just be "as
good
> as a human", it has to be 100 or even 1000 times better than a human, or
it
> will never be allowed to assume full control.   Radar is cheap superhero
> capability.
> 
> I think what happened is the semiconductor shortage impacted Tesla's radar
> supply, so they found a work-around.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:16 AM EVDL Administrator via EV <
> ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sometimes I really wonder about Tesla.  With the less than stellar
>> reputation that autopilot already has, it seems odd that they would
>> actually
>> delete some of the system's "eyes."  For the sake of EVs in general, I
>> sure
>> hope they know what they're doing.
>> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
>> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>   Never been to Cleveland when the sun was shining.
>>   Even when it shines, it looks like rain.
>> -- Melanie Safka, "Between the Road Signs"
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> ___
>> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:

> 
> --
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> ___
> EV@lists.evdl.org
> For general EVDL support, see http://evdl.org/help/
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 
> 
> --
> 
> End of EV Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27
> ***

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org

Re: [EVDL] tesla now using cameras only

[Mark Laity-Snyder via EV]

So how do you determine what has priority using both vision and radar? One of 
the problems Tesla has is phantom breaking.  If you use both,  You have a 
situation where one could be saying go and the other says break.  Obviously 
breaking has to override go to be safe.  But then the car can break when not 
needed and you get rear ended because the guy behind saw no reason for your 
breaking because there was none.  

Sent from my iPhone

> IMO, Musk is not smart enough to listen to his AP team.  (some of the best
> people in the world at this)   He's known for firing people who resist his
> ideas.
> 
> I use Tesla AP all the time, and often in heavy Bay Area traffic.  One of
> the cool tricks radar enabled is detecting a car in front of another car in
> front of you.  For instance, say a Honda Civic is in front, followed by a
> Ford Excursion.  The Honda slams on his brakes, but the Excursion guy is on
> his phone and doesn't see the Honda until it's too late.  My radar-equipped
> Tesla will slow down as soon as the Honda does, giving more time for cars
> to react behind me.   It's literally saved the day on more than one
> occasion.
> 
> Elon's theory is "People drive with vision only, they don't have Lidar or
> Radar".  That's bullshit.  Driver assistance systems have to be superhuman
> if we are going to let them have full authority.  It can't just be "as good
> as a human", it has to be 100 or even 1000 times better than a human, or it
> will never be allowed to assume full control.   Radar is cheap superhero
> capability.
> 
> I think what happened is the semiconductor shortage impacted Tesla's radar
> supply, so they found a work-around.
> 
> 
> On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 11:16 AM EVDL Administrator via EV <
> ev@lists.evdl.org> wrote:
> 
>> Sometimes I really wonder about Tesla.  With the less than stellar
>> reputation that autopilot already has, it seems odd that they would
>> actually
>> delete some of the system's "eyes."  For the sake of EVs in general, I
>> sure
>> hope they know what they're doing.
>> David Roden, EVDL moderator & general lackey
>> To reach me, don't reply to this message; I won't get it.  Use my
>> offlist address here : http://evdl.org/help/index.html#supt
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>>   Never been to Cleveland when the sun was shining.
>>   Even when it shines, it looks like rain.
>> -- Melanie Safka, "Between the Road Signs"
>> = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
>> ___
>> Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
>> No other addresses in TO and CC fields
>> UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
>> ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
>> LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> -- next part --
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Subject: Digest Footer
> 
> ___
> EV@lists.evdl.org
> For general EVDL support, see http://evdl.org/help/
> http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org
> 
> 
> --
> 
> End of EV Digest, Vol 103, Issue 27
> ***

___
Address messages to ev@lists.evdl.org
No other addresses in TO and CC fields
UNSUBSCRIBE: http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#usub
ARCHIVE: http://www.evdl.org/archive/
LIST INFO: http://lists.evdl.org/listinfo.cgi/ev-evdl.org