Ok great I’ll have to polish my glasses. It looked like a female receptical
when it watched it. Good to know.
Lawrence
> On Jan 9, 2018, at 20:42, Bill Dube via EV wrote:
>
> I have never understood why the NEC _requires_ an EV charging plug be
> "locking".
> It makes no
Chances are it was jury rigged and had no breakers protecting the line. It's
common in India to string wiring every which way from wherever there is an
existing power point. It's a wonder there aren't more house fires. I think
what the article was saying is there should have been a dedicated
This is in the ball park of an average North American home these days. It's
likely the local transformer has sufficient overcapacity for one or two
additional homes in a subdivision so it's possible. Not the best solution but
if it's all that's available not unreal either.
Lawrence
> On Aug
Congratulations.
Lawrence
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 04:12, Pestka Denis via EV wrote:
>
> Congrats Bill and Eva !
>
> Dennis
>
>
> From: EV on behalf of Bill Dube via EV
>
> Sent:
>From what I have read is its ok to charge lithium to 100% but it's best not to
>leave it there for extended periods. If you need the range then by all means
>get a full charge but maybe time it so you can leave shortly after reaching
>it. Day to day using an 80% charge point just simplifies
Any reason not to just use a J1772 portable charger?
Lawrence
> On Nov 21, 2015, at 13:57, Jay Summet via EV wrote:
>
> Here is the specific circuit I have designed.
>
> http://s9.postimg.org/ikp4miuhb/inlet_schematic.png
>
> I would like any feedback on the above
Trouble is you didn't own the car when it was disabled. It may have disabled
itself for safety reasons. It was a pile of junk you bought it. You have think
you have rebuilt a car from that junk and now you want the systems activated
without showing that the system is in any state where that can
, 2014, at 7:42, Ben Goren b...@trumpetpower.com wrote:
On Oct 2, 2014, at 7:14 AM, Haritech (Gmail) via EV ev@lists.evdl.org
wrote:
Trouble is you didn't own the car when it was disabled.
Then the sale was fraudulent, whether intentionally so or otherwise. The
buyer thought he was buying