Actually TESLA UMC does not have any UL stamp on it, correct?
Marco
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Cor van de Water via EV
wrote:
> As far as I know, the only thing not "allowed" with the non-UL unit is
> that PG does not accept your entrance in the rebate program for the
Don't use it, it is NOT UL approved. Not allowed in Alameda or San Jose
County as well as others.
--
View this message in context:
http://electric-vehicle-discussion-list.413529.n4.nabble.com/eMotorWerks-inline-adapter-JuicePlug-makes-dumb-j1772-EVSE-smart-tp4681030p4681031.html
Sent from the
City and County codes doe not permit the use of any product for EV charging
that is not UL approved. This is for every ones safety which I guess you don
care about. Beef, you sound like a forum junkie. Maybe in Arizona you don't
care about other people. Best you rethink your position on this
85719
> -Original Message-
> From: EV [mailto:ev-boun...@lists.evdl.org] On Behalf Of Cruisin via EV
> Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 6:36 AM
> To: ev@lists.evdl.org
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772
EVSE
> smart
>
> C
> Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2016 9:56 PM
> To: Electric Vehicle Discussion List
> Subject: Re: [EVDL] eMotorWerks' inline-adapter JuicePlug makes dumb j1772
EVSE
> smart
>
> Actually TESLA UMC does not have any UL stamp on it, correct?
>
> Marco
>
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at
On 17 Mar 2016 at 8:18, Rush Dougherty via EV wrote:
> As David R says so often, what you say on the internet stays on the
> internet...
Yep.
I also say: "Argue your points with verifiable facts, not insults or abuse."
(EVDL conventions, point 1e.)
http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#conv