> This monitoring is done by more accurate sensors, which not only aids in
> managing Ultium’s Nickel-Cobalt-Manganese-Aluminum cells but will provide the
> precision necessary for the future, even more, finicky chemistries such as
> lithium iron phosphate, Aquilano added. “Having the sensors
Well yeah, it could be a little or a lot. That’s why I asked.
Alan seemed to think it was a downside worth noting, so maybe he knows. If it’s
just a trivial amount, it’s not really a downside, and the criticism was unfair.
- Mark
Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2020, at
Only way to find out is to sign an NDA with Analog Devices.
*OR* buy some and see.
I'm sure some white-hats will check this out. :)
Cheers, Peter
On 9/24/20 5:38 PM, Mark Abramowitz via EV wrote:
How much extra energy does it require? 1%? 10%? 0.01%?
- Mark
Sent from my Fuel Cell powered
Mark Abramowitz via EV wrote:
How much extra energy does it require? 1%? 10%? 0.01%?
Exactly. Who knows? Probably GM; but they didn't say.
It could be a lot, or a little. It all depends on what they're using. If
it's something like wifi, it's a lot. If it's something like RFID, it's
very
How much extra energy does it require? 1%? 10%? 0.01%?
- Mark
Sent from my Fuel Cell powered iPhone
> On Sep 24, 2020, at 5:33 PM, Alan Arrison via EV wrote:
>
> Sheesh, nothing like over-hyping. They conveniently don't mention any
> downside like extra energy needed for the wireless
Sheesh, nothing like over-hyping. They conveniently don't mention any
downside like extra energy needed for the wireless communication or
possible interference to said communication.
On 9/24/2020 9:49 AM, moskowitz via EV wrote:
