Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Watt-if Nissan aimed a GT-R production EV solely for performance

2015-10-21 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:02 AM, brucedp5 via EV wrote: > "We can't build an electric GT-R today. But do I want to? I'd love to." I'll bet Elon Musk LOVES reading statements like that. David Roden - Akron, Ohio, USA EVDL Administrator = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Watt-if Nissan aimed a GT-R production EV solely for performance

2015-10-21 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Oct 21, 2015, at 3:02 AM, brucedp5 via EV wrote: > “We can’t build an electric GT-R today. But do I want to? I’d love to.” I _still_ say this would be a major tipping point. And I don't buy that Nissan, maker of the world's best-selling full-sized electric vehicle, can't

Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Watt-if Nissan aimed a GT-R production EV solely for performance

2015-10-21 Thread EVDL Administrator via EV
On 21 Oct 2015 at 10:48, Ben Goren via EV wrote: > This some over-unity reference? >From the EVDL conventions ( http://www.evdl.org/help/index.html#conv ) "Don't post about overunity devices, magnetic motors, free energy, perpetual motion machines, or anything else that appears to violate the

Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Watt-if Nissan aimed a GT-R production EV solely for performance

2015-10-21 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:03 AM, EVDL Administrator via EV wrote: >> "We can't build an electric GT-R today. But do I want to? I'd love to." > > I'll bet Elon Musk LOVES reading statements like that. I don't think he does. Tesla shareholders focused on quarterly earnings

Re: [EVDL] EVLN: Watt-if Nissan aimed a GT-R production EV solely for performance

2015-10-21 Thread Ben Goren via EV
On Oct 21, 2015, at 10:41 AM, Curt Coleman wrote: > Interested in a no battery solution? Huh? This some over-unity reference? b& -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 801