Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-09 Thread Günther Greindl
Thomas, (Apropos Günther Greindl's remark: space as the self moving in relation to everything else, time as everything outside the self moving in relation to oneself. it's funny that already in 1895, in his novel The Time Machine, H.G. Wells wrote, There is no difference between time and

Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread Bruno Marchal
Hi John, I decided so many times not to reflect to the esoteric sci-fi assumptions (thought experiments?) on this list - about situations beyond common sense, their use as templates for consequences. It is as you wish, but it is my way to question the humans, through UDA. Then the

Re: Boltzmann Brains, consciousness and the arrow of time

2009-01-09 Thread Günther Greindl
Hi Bruno, and Cantor get a contradiction from that. You assume the diagram is indeed a piece of an existing bijection in Platonia, or known by God. No, you misunderstand me there - I just meant that we need to take the step to infinity - see below. that you get by flipping the 0 and 1

Exact Theology was:Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread Günther Greindl
Hello, My domain is theology. scientific and thus agnostic theology. I specialized my self in Machine's theology. Or Human's theology once assuming comp. The UDA shows (or should show) that physics is a branch of theology, so that the AUDA makes Machine's theology experimentally

Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread John Mikes
Brent wrote: ...But the EPR experiments show that this can only hold if the influence of the rest of the world is non-local (i.e. faster than light) and hence inconsistent with relativity... EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. How can one use such artifact as

Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread Günther Greindl
John, Brent, John said: EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. How can one use such artifact as 'evidence' that shows...? Aspect Et Al tested it ages ago, see for instance here: http://www-ece.rice.edu/~kono/ELEC565/Aspect_Nature.pdf Brent said: But the EPR

Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread Kim Jones
On 10/01/2009, at 5:17 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: I admire too. Kim is courageous. Well, for the tenacity we will see :) Gee thanks Doctor! I'll try not disappoint you. At the moment I am devoting an egregious amount of time to searching for employment as my ability to sit and cogitate

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-09 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
2009/1/9 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com: But in a block universe, where each frame contains all of the information for a particular time, the order is implicit. What makes it implicit?... increasing entropy? ...conformance to dynamical laws? These are things outside the frames.

Re: Kim 2.4 - 2.5

2009-01-09 Thread Brent Meeker
John Mikes wrote: Brent wrote: ...But the EPR experiments show that this can only hold if the influence of the rest of the world is non-local (i.e. faster than light) and hence inconsistent with relativity... EPR is a thought-experiment, constructed (designed) to make a point. How

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-09 Thread Brent Meeker
Stathis Papaioannou wrote: 2009/1/9 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com: But in a block universe, where each frame contains all of the information for a particular time, the order is implicit. What makes it implicit?... increasing entropy? ...conformance to dynamical laws? These are

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-09 Thread Stathis Papaioannou
2009/1/10 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com: Consider a simulation of an observer watching a falling stone, running on a digital computer. Does the observer have any way of knowing whether the simulation is being run serially, in parallel, on how many and what kinds of physical machines,

Re: KIM 2.3 (was Re: Time)

2009-01-09 Thread Brent Meeker
Stathis Papaioannou wrote: 2009/1/10 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com: Consider a simulation of an observer watching a falling stone, running on a digital computer. Does the observer have any way of knowing whether the simulation is being run serially, in parallel, on how many and what