Le 11-nov.-06, à 19:07, 1Z a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
Le 11-nov.-06, à 01:09, 1Z a écrit :
No, because there are no possible worlds where (2^32582657)-1
is not a prime number.
This is for me a typical arithmetical realist statement.
Most philosophers who use the possible
worlds
Le 12-nov.-06, à 03:43, Colin Geoffrey Hales a écrit :
As I stuff my head with the bird menagerie, and try to see if I need to
breed a new bird, I find that EC is best thought of as a form of
combinatorics (as you thought, Bruno!).
You should use combinators instead of combinatorics
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
An excellent essay. I agree with almost everything you wrote; and you put
it very well. Would you mind if I cross posted it to Vic Stenger's AVOID-L
mailing list. You can check out the list here:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
Brent Meeker wrote:
An excellent essay. I agree with almost everything you wrote; and you put
it very well. Would you mind if I cross posted it to Vic Stenger's
AVOID-L mailing list. You can check out the list here:
4 matches
Mail list logo