Le 19-déc.-06, à 21:32, Brent Meeker a écrit :
Bruno Marchal wrote:
I know it seems a little bit paradoxical, but then it is my
methodology
to take seriously the interview of the lobian machine, which is
famous for its many paradoxical thoughts.
It is certainly not a reductio against comp,
Brent meeker writes:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Evolution explains why we have good and bad, but it doesn't explain
why good and bad feel as they do, or why we *should* care about good
and bad
That's asking why we should care about what we should care
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Evolution explains why we have good and bad, but it doesn't explain
why good and bad feel as they do, or why we *should* care about good
and bad
That's asking why we should
Hi Maurizio,
Le 11-déc.-06, à 14:29, Maurizio Morabito a écrit :
Hello everybody
I am a 39-year-old male with a Master in Engineering, a scientific
background and an enduring passion for Cosmology
I have been elaborating something along lines similar to Tegmark's
myself for a few years,
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Perhaps none of the participants in this thread really disagree.
Let me see if I can summarise:
Individuals and societies have arrived at ethical beliefs
for a reason, whether that be evolution, what their parents
taught them, or what it says in a book believed to
Moral and natural laws.
An investigation of natural laws, and, in parallel, a defence of
ethical objectivism.The objectivity, to at least some extent, of
science will be assumed; the sceptic may differ, but there is no
convincing some people).
At first glance, morality looks as though it
peterdjones wrote:
Moral and natural laws.
An investigation of natural laws, and, in parallel, a defence
of ethical objectivism.The objectivity, to at least some
extent, of science will be assumed; the sceptic may differ,
but there is no convincing some people).
snip
As ethical
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Evolution explains why we have good and bad, but it doesn't
explain why good and bad feel as they do, or why we *should* care
about good and bad
That's asking why we should care
1Z wrote:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent meeker writes:
Evolution explains why we have good and bad, but it doesn't
explain
why good and bad feel as they do, or why we *should* care about
good
and bad
That's
Jef Allbright wrote:
peterdjones wrote:
Moral and natural laws.
An investigation of natural laws, and, in parallel, a defence of
ethical objectivism.The objectivity, to at least some extent, of
science will be assumed; the sceptic may differ, but there is no
convincing some people).
This is the 3rd time I send a 'test' to myself. I receive list-post on this
gmail address, but my mail does not show up, neither here nor on the
YAHOO-mail address I unsubscribed from.
Am I still on the No e-mail exclusion?
Or does the listserve not recognise my mailing?
John Mikes
The listserver was experiencing a lot of computer pain recently and
that prevented it from function normally :)
John Mikes [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This is the 3rd time I send a 'test' to myself. I receive list-post on this
gmail address, but my mail does not show up, neither here nor on the
Your posts have been coming through. You can check
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list?hl=en yourself to see if your
posts have been received by the group.
- Original Message -
From: John Mikes
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com ; Wei Dai
Sent: Thursday, December 21,
13 matches
Mail list logo
