Thanks John, now I don't feel so bad. Grin
For what it's worth, my plain-English translations of the terms
you mention:
_mass_ = the intrinsic [its own] resistance to being pushed of
something that isn't otherwise stuck down;
_energy_ = motion, particularly as measured and accounted for in
I hope you guys will forgive my irreverence, but in the last
couple of hours for the first time I have managed to read this
thread to here. Having done so, and in the spirit of this
everything-list wherein it is assumed everything is not only
possible but _will_ happen and indeed may already
On 3/25/07, Mark Peaty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope you guys will forgive my irreverence, but in the last
couple of hours for the first time I have managed to read this
thread to here. Having done so, and in the spirit of this
everything-list wherein it is assumed everything is not only
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
This study recent published in Nature suggests not only a neural basis
for morality, but a specific neural basis for a specific kind of morality:
I'd say an irrational morality. I almost always make the utilitarian choice in
those hypothetical moral dilemmas (must
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
On 3/22/07, *Brent Meeker* [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No. I'm talking about a sort of program/data division - which I
recognize is arbitrary in computer program - but I think may have an
analogue in brains. When I write a
5 matches
Mail list logo
