Re: Time

2008-12-18 Thread Brent Meeker
Abram Demski wrote: > [Sorry if this is a duplicate, I think that I did not send correctly > the first time.] > > Bruno, everyone, > > I've decided that it will be more productive/entertaining to post my > various concerns as a new topic. > > What is time? > Time is what you read on a clock. >

Re: Time

2008-12-18 Thread A. Wolf
> What is time? About 7pm EDT, here. (Sorry...haven't had the time to read my flagged posts yet and offer real responses.) Anna --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to

Time

2008-12-18 Thread Abram Demski
[Sorry if this is a duplicate, I think that I did not send correctly the first time.] Bruno, everyone, I've decided that it will be more productive/entertaining to post my various concerns as a new topic. What is time? I'm going to ask a bunch of questions; for the sake of brevity, I'm going t

Re: KIM 2.1

2008-12-18 Thread Bruno Marchal
On 18 Dec 2008, at 03:29, Kim Jones wrote: > > > On 16/12/2008, at 5:11 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote: >> ... >> I assume very short scanning-annihilation times and short receipting- >> reconstitution times. Hypotheses like that, or like the fact that >> your >> "generalized" brain is in your skul