2009/6/13 Torgny Tholerus tor...@dsv.su.se:
Jesse Mazer skrev:
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:40:14 +0200
From: tor...@dsv.su.se
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The seven step-Mathematical preliminaries
It is, as I said above, for me and all other humans to understand
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
2009/6/13 Torgny Tholerus tor...@dsv.su.se:
What do you think about the following deduction? Is it legal or illegal?
---
Define the set A of all sets as:
For all x holds that x belongs to A if and only if x is a set.
This is an general rule
Well it is illegal regarding the rules meaning with these rules set B
does not exist as defined.
2009/6/13 Torgny Tholerus tor...@dsv.su.se:
Quentin Anciaux skrev:
2009/6/13 Torgny Tholerus tor...@dsv.su.se:
What do you think about the following deduction? Is it legal or illegal?
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 11:05:22 +0200
From: tor...@dsv.su.se
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: The seven step-Mathematical preliminaries
Jesse Mazer skrev:
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2009 18:40:14 +0200
From: tor...@dsv.su.se
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
On Apr 24, 4:39 pm, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Any content of consciousness can be an illusion. Consciousness itself
cannot, because without consciousness there is no more illusion at all.
- just catching up with the thread, but I feel compelled to comment
that this is beautifully
5 matches
Mail list logo