Hi Bruno,
I'd like to let you know that I'm following the serie of your letters.
While I have the background you are covering right now, I still enjoy
your insights.
I joined the list like two years ago and from that time I've read most
of your key papers. Honestly, it is not the easiest stuff t
On 12 Jul 2009, at 17:28, John Mikes wrote:
> Dear Bruno,
> when I looked at the set-analysis it immediately popped up that
> {1,3} was missing, -
Good!
> YET - this fantastic discovery of mine did not bring me closer to
> the idea "what are numbers".
And, assuming comp, you never wil
On 10 Jul 2009, at 22:52, Johnathan Corgan wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2009-07-10 at 22:24 +0200, Bruno Marchal wrote:
>
>> I suddenly feel sorry putting too much burden on just one
>> correspondent in the list, and I would appreciate if someone else
>> could propose answers or any remarks to the exercis
Dear Bruno,
when I looked at the set-analysis it immediately popped up that {1,3} was
missing, - YET - this *fantastic* discovery of mine did not bring me
closer to the idea "what are numbers".
It seems I can win the battle and still lose the war.
John
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 9:05 PM, m.a. wrote:
4 matches
Mail list logo
