2009/9/14 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
So then question then becomes how close together do the intermediate points
have to
be to constitute the same experience.
An interesting question. We might investigate it empirically by noting how
closely the
brain processes during one
2009/9/2 Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com:
I'm afraid that still doesn't work. I realise it's counter intuitive,
but this is the point - to recalibrate the intuitions. 'Standard' CTM
postulates that the mind is a computation implemented by the brain,
and hence in principle
On 09 Sep 2009, at 09:21, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Next post: Cantor theorem(s). There is NO bijection between N and
N^N. I will perhaps show that there is no bijection between N and
{0, 1}^N. The proof can easily be adapted to show that there is no
bijection between N and many sets.
On 13 Sep, 18:12, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
Marty,
Could you please clarify to a non-mathematician why the
principle of excluded middle is so central to your thesis (hopefully
without using acronyms like AUDA, UD etc.).
Without the excluded middle (A or not A),
On 13 Sep, 09:02, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 12 Sep 2009, at 16:42, Flammarion wrote:
On 11 Sep, 19:34, Bruno Marchal marc...@ulb.ac.be wrote:
On 11 Sep 2009, at 17:45, Flammarion wrote:
Once you say yes to the doctor, there is a clear sense in which
you (that is
5 matches
Mail list logo
