On 8/5/2011 9:42 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
Comp already shows that it take the form of an uncertainty calculus on
computations. From comp it is easy to derive
indeterminacy/uncertainty, non locality, non clonability of the
apparent primitive matter. From comp + the classical theory of
knowled
On 8/2/2011 10:52 PM, Colin Geoffrey Hales wrote:
The very act of first person-ness (1^st person frame) in X might be
performing the same function ... removing the decoherence apparent to
an external observer of X, while remaining decohered in the frame of
reference of the 3^rd person observer.
On 8/5/2011 9:56 AM, Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 05 Aug 2011, at 02:40, meekerdb wrote:
The Born rule and testable predictions. As Omnes says, "Quantum
mechanics is a probabilistic theory, so naturally it predicts
probabilities."
See for example: arXiv:0905.0624v2 ,0808.2415v1 , 0810.265
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com
[mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Jesse Mazer
Sent: Wednesday, 3 August 2011 3:26 PM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Simulated Brains
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:14 AM, meekerdb wrote:
On 8/2/2011 10:03 PM, Stephen
On Aug 5, 1:00 pm, Bruno Marchal wrote:
> On 05 Aug 2011, at 01:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
>
> > That is my point exactly: inter-subjective agreement is as close to
> > objectivity that we can get.
>
> Of course this is debatable. I would say that elementary arithmetic is
> objective per se. But
On 05 Aug 2011, at 01:37, Craig Weinberg wrote:
That is my point exactly: inter-subjective agreement is as close to
objectivity that we can get.
Of course this is debatable. I would say that elementary arithmetic is
objective per se. But physical realities can indeed be shown, or
argued t
On 05 Aug 2011, at 02:40, meekerdb wrote:
The Born rule and testable predictions. As Omnes says, "Quantum
mechanics is a probabilistic theory, so naturally it predicts
probabilities."
See for example: arXiv:0905.0624v2 ,0808.2415v1 ,
0810.2657v1 and 0312058v3. Of course you may
On 04 Aug 2011, at 20:38, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
On 31 Jul 2011, at 19:31, benjayk wrote:
Bruno Marchal wrote:
The notion of a TOE usually is used in a reductionist sense, as a
theory that can be used to predict everything.
A TOE should do that, in principle at leas
8 matches
Mail list logo