On 25 Apr 2014, at 07:39, Samiya Illias wrote:
Does scientific research back the claims made in this article?
Yes. Social amoeba are unicellular (capitalist) in good time, and
become communist in hard time. May be we should learn from them.
I say yes but there are some details which I
Just to contain the enthusiasm within rational levels:
There is no comunism neither comunitarism at all. It is a fight
between groups of clones that try to exploit one another (see below).
The clones are comunists (because are clones, like the social
insects).
However the phenomenon is
On 24 Apr 2014, at 19:18, 'Chris de Morsella cdemorse...@yahoo.com'
via Everything List wrote:
From: everything-list@googlegroups.com [mailto:everything-list@googlegroups.com
] On Behalf Of Bruno Marchal
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 8:23 AM
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
It gives hints about the emergence of multicelular organisms. The next
step is to detect and kill non clones (that can have genes that codify
exploitative behaviours). These non clones will be renamed
infections or cancer. The following step is further specialization
and tissues.
The evolution of
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 9:26 AM, Alberto G. Corona agocor...@gmail.comwrote:
Just to contain the enthusiasm within rational levels:
There is no comunism neither comunitarism at all. It is a fight
between groups of clones that try to exploit one another (see below).
The clones are comunists
Even the analogy between social insects and communism seems flawed to
me, because social insects operate without central control. A find
communism more akin to how humans design machines. Social insects are
anarco-syndicalists, maybe :)
Or like communism in the final stage of the utopia where
6 matches
Mail list logo
