On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 11:57:08 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 6:52 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 8:28:27 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 11:48:48 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 5:28 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at
On 2/27/2018 6:52 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 8:28:27 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell
wrote:
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February
On 2/27/2018 5:28 PM, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrays...@gmail.com
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 8:28:27 PM UTC-5, Lawrence Crowell wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 8:00:56 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I used to work on Carl Sagan's
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 8:44:30 PM UTC-5, John Clark wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:10 PM,
> wrote:
>
> >
>> I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite well.
>>
>
> *No, I don't think so.*
>
> *John K Clark *
>
*I've argued over
On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 1:10 PM, wrote:
>
> I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite well.
>
*No, I don't think so.*
*John K Clark *
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 7:00:56 PM UTC-6, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > I used to work on Carl Sagan's
On 2/27/2018 2:40 PM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite
well.
> What is striking about the
On Tuesday, February 27, 2018 at 3:32:18 PM UTC-5, Brent wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
> > I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite well.
> > What is striking about the YouTube videos, particularly the one
> > initiating the
*In fact, the situation is comparable to 19th Century claims that stones
fall from the sky. The reports were fairly widespread but sporadic. It was
"only" eyewitness accounts until one fell through a farm house roof in
France. The only difference now is that the government, for whatever
The evidence for this stuff is pretty crummy. The reason these things are
removed from serious scientific discussions is the same reason physics
conferences and journals do not admit geocentric ideas. If we are supposed
to consider and then reconsider and reconsider again and ... ad infinitum
On 2/27/2018 10:10 AM, agrayson2...@gmail.com wrote:
I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite well.
What is striking about the YouTube videos, particularly the one
initiating the organization, where many physicists, engineers,
astronauts, etc;, were present affirming
On Tuesdaextra terrestrial intelligence, but wax authoritatively on the
subject. And to protect your bias, you no doubt continue to refuse to view
and independently assess the witnesses in the video I posted earlier. I
coy, February 27, 2018 at 1:10:49 PM UTC-5, agrays...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>
On 2/27/2018 2:42 AM, Telmo Menezes wrote:
Depends on what you mean by "proof", we sentence people to prison based on
proof of their crime. Not all proof is mathematical. And mathematical
proof is only relative to the axioms.
I think that this is one of those cases where the term is
I used to work on Carl Sagan's staff and I know his views quite well. What
is striking about the YouTube videos, particularly the one initiating the
organization, where many physicists, engineers, astronauts, etc;, were
present affirming the existence of extraterrestrials in contact with our
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM, wrote:
http://siriusdisclosure.com/evidence/
You urgently need to develop a baloney detection kit! Read Carl Sagan’s
book "The Demon-Haunted World” especially the chapter titled “The Fine Art
of Baloney Detection” because Sagan lists 20
> Depends on what you mean by "proof", we sentence people to prison based on
> proof of their crime. Not all proof is mathematical. And mathematical
> proof is only relative to the axioms.
I think that this is one of those cases where the term is overloaded.
I would argue that, for most people,
19 matches
Mail list logo