On 15 Jun 2002, at 14:27, Russell Standish wrote:
No the issue concerns any conscious program, rather than any
particular one. The fact that there are vastly more amoeba than homo
sapiens tends to argue against amoebae being consious.
This remind me of Jack Vance novels Alastor.
One of
On 18 Apr 2002, at 20:03, H J Ruhl wrote:
5) I do not see universes as splitting by going to more than one next
state. This is not necessary to explain anything as far as I can see.
6) Universes that are in receipt of true noise as part of a state to state
transition are in effect
On 22 Jan 2002, at 23:28, H J Ruhl wrote:
I do not see that at all. Why does it need a history? All it needs
is
the
capability of finding a next state.
It doesn't need the capacity to find the next state. If it has that
capacity, then the history is computable.
I said
Hi,
Instead of replying too quickly to a mail, maybe I should introduce myself
before.
I'm a 28 years old network software engineer.
I have exchanged some mails with Bruno Marchal quite a long time ago, after
an article in Pour la Science (french edition of Scientific American.)
I also have
On 15 Jan 2002, at 11:31, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the things that strikes me as most peculiar and unexpected about the
universe is this: that it is apparently finite and inhomogeneous in time,
yet infinite and homogeneous in space.
The universe is finite :
My short term memory last
5 matches
Mail list logo
