Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-18 Thread LizR
I think that's what the ///C: part refers to. But it is here on the Everything List. On 19 September 2014 14:22, Richard Ruquist wrote: > I bookmarked the first volume. Here is my link: > > file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Helen/My%20Documents/Downloads/2014_Hales_TheRevolutions_Ch1to8.pdf

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-18 Thread Richard Ruquist
I bookmarked the first volume. Here is my link: file:///C:/Documents%20and%20Settings/Helen/My%20Documents/Downloads/2014_Hales_TheRevolutions_Ch1to8.pdf Not sure it will work since it appears to be unique to my wife's computer. Richard On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 6:48 PM, LizR wrote: > Assuming th

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-18 Thread LizR
Assuming this works, you can find it here https://mail.google.com/mail/u/1/#label/Everything-list/1486768414de572f if not search the EL for "book section 1/2" (at least that works for me). If not Colin Hales posted it on the EL on 12/9 as a PDF attachment with the title "RE: Book: Revolution​s o

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-18 Thread mickey . beergate
correcting a typo that may have rendered my words a nonsense. In the second paragraph I said: "but I am getting that you are visualizing concepts, that do map across to common vocabulary" What I wanted to say was: "but I am getting that you are visualizing concepts, that do NOT across to c

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-18 Thread mickey . beergate
On Saturday, September 13, 2014 10:20:00 PM UTC+1, ColinHales wrote: > > Hi Liz, Mike, et.al. > Dear Dr Hales, I would like to see the first half document if you would be so kind to send it across to me. Your core insights appear with interesting qualities. I may perceive this wrongly, but

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-13 Thread Kim Jones
> On 14 Sep 2014, at 8:33 am, Richard Ruquist wrote: > > I am going to have a go at establishing a forum for the first act of science > self-governance in the modern era. Nothing governs itself. Everything is in the clutches of some agenda or other for better or worse - whether conscious or

Re: Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-13 Thread Richard Ruquist
Colin, I very strongly disagree with your intentions even though I believe in a dual-aspect reality. Science does very well right now based on experimental confirmation of hypothesis. Your first step should be to establish how a dual-aspect science can be experimentally verified. Frankly you have

Causing the 2nd revolution of scientific structure

2014-09-13 Thread ColinHales
Hi Liz, Mike, et.al. It's time for the nature/descriptions of it/math relationship to undergo some formal attention by science. Discussions of the options we have in how we humans behave when describing the universe, in any other human social context, would be the job of a *governing body