On Sunday, January 4, 2015 2:22:06 AM UTC, Kim Jones wrote:
Why would you recommend others read something you have not? You don't see
that as being just a little strange?
I don't do that that I can remember. I doubt I would ever bother. But what
exactly 'reading' involves and how much
I know that the mere notion of human sacrifices as the cornerstone of every
society inspire horror to modern men and they don´t dare to consider it.
And yet the conclusion is unescapable. That explain a lot about the
modernity.
If you dismiss organizeed religion and his altar of sacrifices, then
There are previous evolutionary studies of religion leaded by David Sloan
Wilson.
I think that they only scratch the surface. But it is a good start. I wrote
in this group about the need of human sacrifices to create an stable
society if natural selection and game theory are accepted as
On 04 Jan 2015, at 02:14, zibblequib...@gmail.com wrote:
In the first instance I'm posting this recently accepted paper (link
is to full paper), for Bruno and Brent reference a recent discussion
between them about the part of large scale religion in the emergence
of ever-more complex
In the first instance I'm posting this recently accepted paper (link is to
full paper), for Bruno and Brent reference a recent discussion between them
about the part of large scale religion in the emergence of ever-more
complex society. Brent has me on ignore...I'm not sure about
Why would you recommend others read something you have not? You don't see that
as being just a little strange?
Anyway I read the paper. The authors' conclusion? That pro-social religion
(which I understand to mean institutionalised religion is probably here to
stay. They kind of just
6 matches
Mail list logo
