In this note I indicate how the local transformation gauge-like physics of 
gravitation can preserve the unitarity of a quantum system, In this there 
is an identification of the conformal group of spacetime physics or general 
relativity with an orthogonal gauge group from the Bloch vector, or 
extended analogue thereof, with the gauge-like SU(2,2) group of conformal 
gravitation. A central feature of this is this gauge-like theory conserves 
the entanglement structure of an associated orthogonal group or with SU(2, 
2) ↔ O(15), or to take U(2,2) = SU(2,2)×U(1)  we have U(2,2) ↔ SO(16)

A central aspect in the formalism of entanglement is the Schmidt 
decomposition. A general tensor product of states is 

|ψ⟩ = sum_{ij}C_{ij}|i⟩⊗|j⟩.

Now consider the intermediary state |φ_i⟩ = sum_jC_{ij}|j⟩, which forms |ψ⟩ 
= sum_i|i⟩⊗|φ_i⟩.  The density matrix ρ = |ψ⟩⟨ψ| has the trace with respect 
to the φ states

Tr_φ(ρ) = sum_{ij} ⟨φ_j |φ_i⟩ |i⟩⟨j|,

and we have ⟨φ_j |φ_i⟩ = p_iδ_{ij}. Clearly then we can write 

|ψ⟩ = sum_{ij}√(p_i)|i⟩⊗|j⟩.

This is also a polar form of the wave function.

This Schmidt form is with 

√(p_i) = sum_jC_{ij}

where this amplitude transforms as

C_{ij} → C’_{ij} = U_{ik}√(p_k)V_{kj},

The two unitary matrices U_{ik} and V_{kj} are transformations of the two 
states |i⟩ and |j⟩ and the transformation of the amplitude C_{ij} is given 
by the product.  A simple case is with a simple spin model of SU(2) so the 
product of the two unitary groups is SU(2)×SU(2) = SO(4).

We can use this with density matrices as a set of diagonal plus 
off-diagonal states. Consider, the N×N density matrix

ρ_{ij}  = p_iδ_{ij} + σ_iτ_j, i and j =1 … N^2 - 1

where the first term corresponds to maximally mixed states for p_i = 1/N 
and the second terms are the off-diagonal quantum phase. Here σ_i is a 
generator of an SU(N) group and τ_j a B;och vector. The space of all unit 
trace Tr(ρ) = 1 of all N×N density matrices is a manifold designated by ℳ. 
This manifold is the intersection, in the set of all Hermitian matrices, of 
a positive cone P with the hyperplane parallel to all linear traceless 
operators. This is a convex set defined by the set of all projectors onto a 
one-dimensional subspace. This the defines the projective geometry ℂP^{N-1} 
in the Hilbert space of ℳ. 

There is more geometry I could discuss but will defer to later. This 
involves some subtle issues with the relationship between the diagonal 
trace terms and the off diagonal term corresponding to quantum phases.

The group theoretic implications of this are then interesting. Consider the 
rotation of the Bloch vector τ_i → τ’_i according the unitary 
transformation of the density matriz

τ’_i = ½Tr(ρ’)σ_i = [ σ_kU_{ki}σ_lU^†_{lj} ] τ_j = sum_jO_{ij} τ_j.

We then have SO(N^2 - 1) matrices that are associated with SU(N), or more 
properly that SU(N)/ℤ_N is a subset of SO(N^2 - 1). To consider this let N 
= 4, then we have that SU(4)/ ℤ_4 is a subset of SO(15). SO(15) is fixed in 
a frame of SO(16) and this corresponds to a U(1) fibration over SU(4) as 
U(4) = SU(4)×U(1). 

The Hopf fibration defines the sphere S^4 = O(6)/O(5) or that O(6) ≈ U(4) 
is the 4-sphere with an O(5) fibration. If we shift to a hyperbolic setting 
then we have O(4,2)/SO(5,1) = AdS_5. with the quotient on the O(4,2) = 
U(2,2). We then clearly have a correspondence with the orthogonal group 
SO(16).  The correspondence to AdS_5×S^5 is then with the Cartan 
decomposition SO(32) → SO(16)×*120* and the corresponding unitary group is 
U(2,2,ℂ) in complex conformal relativity. There is a conservation of 
information between the U(2,2) and SO(16), where the first pertains to 
conformal gravitation and the latter a gauge field theory.

There is the issue of a “sleight of hand” where the unitary group is in 
split form, corresponding to spacetime with Lorentzian metric and the 
orthogonal group is Euclidean and corresponds to a gauge group. The claim 
here is that for the Lorentzian group a difficulty is this leads to 
negative probabilities. However, this really is not as bad as one might 
think. Coherent states, such as with laser photons or condensates, have 
this feature. These forms of quantum states have both a Riemannian and 
symplectic geometric structure. These over-complete quantum states give a 
way that classical-like structure can emerge from quantum physics. The 
central feature of pure state quantum mechanics is linearity of Hilbert 
space of states and operators. The transition to nonlinearity with this 
conservation of information, say qubits ↔ spatial or spacetime information, 
is a feature of how state collapse and the stability of classical states 
does not violate conservation of information.

Noq consider the group theoretic implications of this are then interesting. 
Consider the rotation of the Bloch vector τ_i → τ’_i according the unitary 
transformation of the density matriz

τ’_i = ½Tr(ρ’)σ_i = [ σ_kU_{ki}σ_lU^†_{lj} ] τ_j = sum_jO_{ij} τ_j.

which we rewrite for the entanglement of states 

|ψ⟩ = sum_{ij}C_{ij}|i⟩⊗|j⟩

So the amplitude with Schmidt form √(p_i) = sum_jC_{ij} transforms as

C_{ij} → C’_{ij} = U_{ik}√(p_k)V_{kj},

The two unitary matrices U_{ik} and V_{kj} are transformations of the two 
states |i⟩ and |j⟩ and the transformation of the amplitude C_{ij} is given 
by the product.  The density matrix is then expanded as

ρ_{ij}  = p_iδ_{ij} + σ_iτ_j, i and j =1 … N^2 - 1

and the Bloch vector with τ’_iτ_j = ½Tr(ρ’)σ_iτ_j = ½Tr(ρ’)g_{ij} is also 
τ’_iτ_j = sum_kO_{ik}τ_kτ_j. This is a form of metric.

The entangled state defines 

|ψ⟩⟨ψ| = sum_{ij}C*_{ij}C_{ij}|i⟩⊗|i⟩⟨j|⊗⟨j|.

such that the transformation of the amplitude square is

C’*_{ij} C’_{ij} = sum_{kk’}√(p_kp_k’)U_{ik}V_{kj} U_{ik’}V_{k’j},

So, the density matrix is identified as

ρ_{ij} = sum_{kk’}O_{ik}O’_{k’j} τ_kτ_k’

where the O_{ik} is the SO(N^2 - 1) transformation with U and O_{k’j} is 
the SO(N^2 – 1) transformation with V. This is then a form with a metric on 
the Bloch sphere given by τ_kτ_k’. 

The entangled state with C_{ij} = e^{-E_{ij}β/2}, ordinarily β = 1/kT in 
Euclidean form, but equivalent to it/ħ in Lorentzian form, can be used to 
examine the overlap of states. We compute to O(δt^3) the overlap ⟨ψ|ψ + 
δψ⟩, here with the variation with respect to proper time in a local frame,

⟨ψ|ψ + δψ⟩ = 1 - (i/ħ)⟨H⟩δt - (1/2ħ^2)(⟨H^2⟩ - iħ)⟨H’⟩)δt^2

+ (1/3!ħ^3)(i⟨H^3⟩ - iħ^2⟨H’’⟩)δt^3

The derivative H’ of the Hamiltonian H = sum_{i=0}^{N^2-1}ε_iσ_i is 
determined by the covariant derivative of σ_i

Dσ_i/ds = u∇_uσ_i = u∂_uV(σ_i’) + uΓV(σ_i’),

which corresponds to a geodesic motion and is then zero for V = u. The 
cryptic term (σ_i’) just means a differential of the bloch vector with 
respect to spatial or spacetime coordinates and V = dx/ds. The second 
derivative H’’ is determined by 

D^2σ_i/ds^2 = d/ds(∇σ)u = σ_i’R(u,V,u) → (e_i’)_μR^μ_{ανβ}U^αV^νU^β,

which is a geodesic deviation equation. The vector σ_i is determined by a 
vector connecting two regions of spacetime. These contribute to O(δt) and 
δt^3. However, when we compute the modulus square, we find


|⟨ψ|ψ + δψ⟩|^2 = 1 - (1/ħ^2)(⟨H^2⟩ - ⟨H⟩^2)δt^2 .

where the geodesic condition removes any ⟨H’⟩ and the geodesic motion has 
not contribution because the δt^3 is imaginary valued and subtracts out. 
This recovers the standard measure for quantum metric distance with ΔH = 
⟨H^2⟩ - ⟨H⟩^2 and this gives the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. 

This illustrates how gravitation can maintain unitarity as a sort of 
equivalence principle. The dynamics with the vector σ_i defines the 
transformation of the matrices O_{ij} that transform the Bloch vectors. The 
violation of unitarity occurs though at higher orders. However, if we 
consider the variation in the time or proper time as related to a variation 
in the spacetime, then δt, δt^2 and δt^3 define a fluctuation in a linear 
direction, an area and a volume. The dynamics of spacetime is according to 
the dynamics of space with respect to time. Holography tells us as well 
that δL^3/L^3 = ℓ_p^2/L^2 so that δL^3 = ℓ_p^2L is the highest order term 
that is physically relevant. 

It is then apparent the equivalence principle expressed as the invariance 
of an entanglement between two particles in curved spacetime preserves 
unitarity. The modulus square |⟨ψ|ψ + δψ⟩|^2 = 1 - (1/ħ^2)(⟨H^2⟩ - 
⟨H⟩^2)δt^2 is the Fubini-Study metric for QM according to the projective 
fibration π:ℋ → Pℋ which for a finite Hilbert space is ℂP^n. In this way 
the quantum phase structure of this internal gauge group associated with 
conformal group of relativity is conserved. 

LC

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/c399b58c-6795-48f2-afea-23c8b8b9464e%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to