On 20 Jan 2009, at 05:22, Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> Günther Greindl wrote:
>
>>
>> The question is, why the quantum (as Wheeler, I think, put it)?
>> Bruno's
>> COMP gives a very elegant _explanation_.
>
> I agree it is elegant, but whether it can really explain the world
> remains to be
> se
Hi Brent,
> I didn't use the term - it is one being attributed to me simply because I
> question the adequacy of logic and mathematics to instantiate physics.
That is ok - there are different versions of materialism/physicalism etc.
> I don't accept any such esoteric theories - I merely entert
Günther Greindl wrote:
> Brent,
>
> I wonder, what do you mean with materialism (I ask this having been a
> materialist myself)?
I didn't use the term - it is one being attributed to me simply because I
question the adequacy of logic and mathematics to instantiate physics.
>
> Physics only d
Brent,
I wonder, what do you mean with materialism (I ask this having been a
materialist myself)?
Physics only describes relations. (see for instance here
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/structural-realism/)
I gather you accept MWI, so quite a lot of relations hold.
The question is, why th
4 matches
Mail list logo