Hmm Professor, I am thinking metallic h2 as a primo fusion fuel. Forget
magnetic fusion, use inertial confinement fusion against metallic targets.
Having said this, it's probably an energy sink, with the immense pressures
needed to form metallic hydrogen.
-Original Message-
From:
That's pretty consistent with the first paper, which only claimed a
rocket chamber temperature of ~6,000K for pure metallic hydrogen.
Diluting it with LH2 or water was just an idea to reduce the temperature
to something more manageable, at the cost of specific impulse.
Can't do the calculations
First, the H atoms in metallic hydrogen are already bound to other H
atoms, so you don't get that H+H=H2+436kJ/mol. Second,
H2+O=H2O+517kJ/mol. Since a mol of water is 9 times as heavy as a mol
of H2 it's sonic velocity is 3 times lower. So even if you could take
advantage of the H+H
I think the intent is that metallic hydrogen alone is the fuel,
as a metastable way of storing some fraction of atomic
hydrogen recombination energy. H + H -> H2 at 52,000K
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 20:51 , Brent Meeker wrote:
>
> Makes no sense. Isp it just exhaust velocity
Makes no sense. Isp it just exhaust velocity which depends on the
energy release per molecule of the combustion products. The energy per
H2O molecule isn't going to be any different when the H came from
metallic instead of liquid hydrogen. Having metallic hydrogen might
make the rocket
5 matches
Mail list logo