In a message dated 12/05/1999 8:57:28 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is an obvious normalisation problem with the usual model of
branching histories in MWI (I see from your signature you at least
accept that!). Since the total number of histories (belonging
On Thu, 4 Nov 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
[JM wrote] [BTW I am getting tired of RS omitting the attribution]
^^^ Blame my email software. I almost always leave the .signatures in
to make it obvious who I'm responding to.
Since your
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
The measure of Jack Mallah is irrelevant to this situation. The
probability of Jack Mallah seeing Joe Schmoe with a large age is
proportional to Joe Schmoe's measure - because - Joe Schmoe is
independent of Jack Mallah. However, Jack Mallah is
Chris Maloney wrote:
This harkens back to a thread I started some time ago about our universe
being the one, or among the ones, that admit the most SASs. Clearly the
number of observer-moments among the human race is vast, if you assume the
MWI. Most people replied that they thought it was of
On Wed, 15 Sep 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
[JM wrote]
Obviously you don't understand. With the ASSA, it is always
possible to find the conditional probability of an observation given a
suitable condition. Choosing a condition and asking a question about it
changes nothing about
On Mon, 6 Sep 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
On Fri, 3 Sep 1999, Russell Standish wrote:
Then maybe I misunderstood you. A tautology is a term with redundant
parts, ie it is equivalent to some subset of itself. I took your
statement that ASSA is a tautology to mean that ASSA is
6 matches
Mail list logo
