New edition of ``Fields´´

Thenew edition of Siegel's textbook ``Fields´´ can be downloaded from: http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9912205 Saibal

Re: Tegmark's TOE Cantor's Absolute Infinity

Russell Standish writes: [Hal Finney writes;] So I disagree with Russell on this point; I'd say that Tegmark's mathematical structures are more than axiom systems and therefore Tegmark's TOE is different from Schmidhuber's. If you are so sure of this, then please provide a description of

Re: Tegmark's TOE Cantor's Absolute Infinity

I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009. I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify mathematical structures with formal systems. His chart at the first link

Enormous Body of *Evidence* For Analysis-Based TOES

From: Osher Doctorow [EMAIL PROTECTED], Mon. Sept. 23, 2002 12:32PM I refer readers to http://www.superstringtheory.com/forum, especially to the String - M Theory - Duality subforum of their Forum section (membership is free, and archives are open to members, and many of my postings are in the

Re: Tegmark's TOE Cantor's Absolute Infinity

On Monday, September 23, 2002, at 11:34 AM, Hal Finney wrote: I have gone back to Tegmark's paper, which is discussed informally at http://www.hep.upenn.edu/~max/toe.html and linked from http://arXiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9704009. I see that Russell is right, and that Tegmark does identify