Re: Definitions and Argument (was RE: Penrose, wave function collapse and MWI)

2004-03-01 Thread Bruno Marchal
At 14:36 28/02/04 +, Brett Hall wrote: I think this clarifies things a little. My original way of writing what I interpreted the incompleteness theorem to be was to say that there exist (in sufficiently complex axiomatic) systems in which there are true propositions without proof. I think

Re: Tegmark is too physics-centric

2004-03-01 Thread Bruno Marchal
At 10:33 28/02/04 +1100, Russell Standish wrote: I deliberately leave vague what is in the theory of the mind, but simply assume a small number of things about consciousness: 1) That there is a linear dimension called (psycholgical) time, in which the conscious mind find itself embedded 2) The