Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Hello Dave/Chris,
I agree with everything you say, and have long admired The Hedonistic
Imperative. Motivation need not be linked to pain, and for that matter
it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can imagine an artificial
intelligence without any
Brent Meeker writes:
I agree with everything you say, and have long admired The Hedonistic
Imperative. Motivation need not be linked to pain, and for that matter
it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can imagine an artificial
intelligence without any emotions but completely
Le 25-déc.-06, à 01:13, Tom Caylor a écrit :
It looks like I might have timed out. Hopefully this doesn't appear
two times.
On Dec 24, 8:55 am, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 24-déc.-06, à 09:48, Tom Caylor a écrit :
Bruno,
...
I believe the answer to the question, What is
On Dec 26, 9:51 am, Bruno Marchal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le 25-déc.-06, à 01:13, Tom Caylor a écrit :
The crux is that he is not symbolic...
I respect your belief or faith, but I want to be frank, I have no
evidences for the idea that Jesus is truth, nor can I be sure of
any clear
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
Brent Meeker writes:
I agree with everything you say, and have long admired The
Hedonistic Imperative. Motivation need not be linked to pain, and
for that matter it need not be linked to pleasure either. We can
imagine an artificial intelligence without any
Brent, you don't REALLY put strange (implied?) words in my mouth, but that
gives the impression to the innocent byreader that I said anything like
that.
BM:
Did I claim that we had reached a complete inventory??
JM:
No, you only said:
It is only your opinion that the inventory is *necessarily*
John Mikes wrote:
Brent, you don't REALLY put strange (implied?) words in my mouth, but
that gives the impression to the innocent byreader that I said anything
like that.
BM:
Did I claim that we had reached a complete inventory??
JM:
No, you only said:
It is only your opinion that the
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
self that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching among various different ways to think
in which different assertions,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
self that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching among various different ways to think
in
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: everything-list@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Evil ? (was: Hypostases (was: Natural Order Belief)
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2006 14:59:17 -0800
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian
Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
But our main criterion for what to believe should be
what is true, right?
I find it fascinating, as well as consistent with some difficulties in
communication about the most basic concepts, that Stathis would express
this belief of his in the form of a tautology.
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
self that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is constantly switching among
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
self that maintains beliefs. A more realistic view is that each
person is
On Dec 26, 7:53 pm, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
self that maintains
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 7:53 pm, Brent Meeker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom Caylor wrote:
On Dec 26, 3:59 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I regard the idea of believing to be unsound, because it is a
pre-Freudian concept, which assumes that each person has a single
15 matches
Mail list logo
