On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 09:29:40PM -0500, Hal Ruhl wrote:
As I understand your Theory of Nothing book the Everything in it has or at
least contains time like components [time postulate]. I agree but
apparently for a different reason.
In your reply to Jason you allowed that the OM machine
http://www.boingboing.net/2008/04/01/poltergeists-and-qua.html
I think that answers that question
On 28/03/2008, Russell Standish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just had a cold call from an editor of a fairly new journal called
NeuroQuantology (http://www.neuroquantology.com/), which has its
Hi Russell:
You wrote:
The time postulate is a requirement of observerhood. I'm not sure this
means that time-like components are in the Everything, but I can
accept this is possible.
I don't know of any similar requirement for space, but I have tossed
around some ideas to do with embedding
3 matches
Mail list logo