Artificial Intelligence may be far easier than generally thought

Let the algorithm that represents the brain of a typical new-born baby be denoted as B1. Now surely we can agree that the brain of a new-born baby does not have sophisticated Bayesian machinary built into it? Yes, there must be *some* intrinsic built-in reasoning structure, but everything we

Re: Artificial Intelligence may be far easier than generally thought

Marc, Your closing line is appreciated. Yet: I still cannot get it: how can you include into an algorithm those features that had not yet been discovered? Look at it historically: if you composed such compendium 3000 yeas ago would you have included 'blank potential' unfilled algorithm for those

Re: Spam: Artificial Intelligence may be far easier than generally thought

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let the algorithm that represents the brain of a typical new-born baby be denoted as B1. Now surely we can agree that the brain of a new-born baby does not have sophisticated Bayesian machinary built into it? Yes, there must be *some* intrinsic built-in reasoning

Artificial Intelligence may be far easier than generally thought

*NM* --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups Everything List group. To post to this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options,

Re: Artificial Intelligence may be far easier than generally thought

On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 1:36 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 22, 11:53 pm, John Mikes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marc, Your closing line is appreciated. Yet: I still cannot get it: how can you include into an algorithm those features that had not yet been discovered? Look at it