Rex Allen wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 6:26 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
It seems to me that you are starting with a strong bias towards matter
as fundamental, instead of starting with a clean slate and working
forward from first principles.
2010/1/17 Nick Prince m...@dtech.fsnet.co.uk:
You can see I am struggling with these self sampling assumptions. I
just cannot get a handle on how to think about them.
The SSA is difficult to get one's head around, and sometimes leads to
counterintuitive conclusions. Have you looked up Nick
On Jan 17, 11:51 am, Stathis Papaioannou stath...@gmail.com wrote:
2010/1/17 Nick Prince m...@dtech.fsnet.co.uk:
You can see I am struggling with these self sampling assumptions. I
just cannot get a handle on how to think about them.
The SSA is difficult to get one's head around, and
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
Okay, an underlying objective reality causes the order in what we
experience - but then what causes the order in this underlying
objective reality?
You haven't answered any questions...you've just
Rex Allen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 3:11 AM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
Okay, an underlying objective reality causes the order in what we
experience - but then what causes the order in this underlying
objective reality?
You haven't answered any
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com
wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
What caused it to exist?
Who said it
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Jason Resch jasonre...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:51 PM, Rex Allen rexallen...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 1:59 PM, Brent Meeker
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate here, nevertheless, the
most direct way to find out is to ask it :)
Clearly, creating AI on a computer is a goal, and generally we'll try
and implement to the same degree of computationalness as a human.
But what would happen if we simply tried to
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
So ultimately, there is no reason you value the things you do...that's
just the way things are.
Suppose there was a reason - what would it be like? And why would it make
any difference whether
Rex Allen wrote:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 7:22 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
Rex Allen wrote:
So ultimately, there is no reason you value the things you do...that's
just the way things are.
Suppose there was a reason - what would it be like? And why would it
silky wrote:
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate here, nevertheless, the
most direct way to find out is to ask it :)
Clearly, creating AI on a computer is a goal, and generally we'll try
and implement to the same degree of computationalness as a human.
But what would happen if we
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
silky wrote:
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate here, nevertheless, the
most direct way to find out is to ask it :)
Clearly, creating AI on a computer is a goal, and generally we'll try
and implement to
silky wrote:
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Brent Meeker meeke...@dslextreme.com wrote:
silky wrote:
I'm not sure if this question is appropriate here, nevertheless, the
most direct way to find out is to ask it :)
Clearly, creating AI on a computer is a goal, and generally we'll try
13 matches
Mail list logo
